I have watched this debate carefully and share concerns that the RCN
should be able to support OH nursing effectively.
It seems that:
1. Carol Bannister is staying in her role so there will be continuing OH
nursing expertise in RCN whatever other appointments are made.
2. It seems a SCPHN Professional Adviser post may be in the plan. This
recent debate shows we have many articulate and passionate nurses in our
specialty who can compete for this post.
3. Kim Sunley RCN senior employment adviser has just spoken eloquently and
knowledgeably about OH at the Work and Pensions Select Cttee. (And it is
worth noting that the RCN were the only organisation for clinicians to be
called to give evidence.)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmworpen/uc246-
iii/uc24602.htm
The need for effective OH nursing support in RCN is not in doubt. However,
this debate must focus on organisational capabilities (not individual
people).
The size of the RCN makes it very influential when it turns its attention
to OH. We can make it more influential by playing an active role, voting
in elections, standing in elections, attending meetings and conferences,
and competing for posts.
I value my membership of RCN and AOHNP for different reasons. A strength
of RCN is its size and so broader political impact.
Helen Kirk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.
OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html
FORTHCOMING CONFERENCES AND EDUCATIONAL EVENTS:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JOBS
http://OHJobs.drmaze.net
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING EDUCATION
http://www.aohne.org.uk
|