Nick and all
I have to be irritating here and suggest that actually if you *had* a
Twitter account you might be better positioned to comment on its use...sorry
to be rude, but Twitter is like that..I started off with a blog post saying
I thought it was useless too (http://tinyurl.com/ysuc48) but luckily I'm not
proud (much) and now would say that it *does* actually add to my life...
Taking the Twitter homepage and quoting it as dross misses the point (of the
entire application..) by a looong way...
Second off, make no mistake, I'm *not* saying "people don't want websites",
in the slightest. That might be a foolish and somewhat career-limiting point
of view...
What I *am* saying is that people consume those sites in ways that are not
linear or predictable. Because we're all now terribly good at optimising,
SEO, being current, in-linking etc - our images and content are actually
better found and manipulated with external tools. People are using our
images, our text, our Flash games in places we'd never have imagined. This
is one of the clear changes in the "UGC" world: NOT that these people
contribute content.
You may be sick of Facebook (so am I) but let's not ignore markets by
assuming "they'll die out". Given Paul's point about barriers to entry, I
think we'd be barmy not to play with some of these ideas, spaces and
relationships.
In response to Dylan's point: if we *really* only ever did what our
audiences asked for, museums would all have a single page with our opening
times, location and a list of what's on. That'd make 70% of our audience
happy, so let's just leave it at that, right? Nope. I didn't think so.
This is all a juggle, and a risk, but the costs and effort are usually much
lower than we assume. I still attest that we need to stop talking about the
damn stuff and start doing it. If nothing else, we mght actually touch some
people in new ways, hit some new audiences AND have some fun, too :-)
As a fellow museum Twitterer said recently "Museums are terrified first and
innovative 23rd"....
ta
Mike
________________________________________________
electronic museum
..thoughts on museums, the social web, innovation
w: http://www.electronicmuseum.org.uk
f: http://electronicmuseum.wordpress.com/feed
e: [log in to unmask]
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Nick Poole <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Thanks for this. I want to check something though, to do with your
> assertion:
>
> > More importantly we're also *still* (after all these years...) thinking
> in
> > terms of "a flowable, understandable, linear user experience" through
> "our
> > website". This is NOT (repeat...) how the web works any more.
>
> At the risk of sounding like the 'television? That'll never catch on...'
> guy - I'm really not sure I agree with you.
>
> Up there at the bleeding edge of where the Web goes next there is an
> almost axiomatic mantra (non-linear, fragmented, participative). For real,
> non-technologist users who are seeking information or entertainment, all
> this non-linearity is frankly a bit annoying - for every tech guru I've met
> who says that UGC is the future of media, I meet someone over the age of 35
> who finds it a bit irksome that all these websites are suddenly asking them
> to write stuff for them.
>
> People *do* want websites - because we have a consumer population that are
> used to information being packaged and presented, and they are used to
> making qualitative decisions about the value of that information based on
> brand and credibility.
>
> I am a bit concerned that these developments are really being pushed by
> technology - it's almost as if we said 'ok, we've separated content from
> presentation, we've got stuff in repositories, we've done some
> interoperability stuff. So...er..now what? I know! We can mash it all
> together to create new things, which aren't websites, but which are a bit
> like them, only different.'
>
> Of course, there is a younger demographic who are Bebo-ing themselves
> silly, but they'll grow up and there is always the possibility that they'll
> grow out of it. I *really* don't want to sit on enthusiasm and innovation,
> and I completely accept the 'speculative can lead to longer-term' argument
> which Tehmina puts forward but how do we distinguish real, permanent seismic
> shifts in the nature of the Web and online consumers from the short-term
> whorls and eddies of fashion?
>
> I am sick of my Facebook, I haven't been back to my MySpace in weeks, my
> Bebo account is almost dead, I've got at least 4 moribund blogs and every
> time I post a comment on a Wiki I get flamed by an American teenager. Is
> this really the brave new world we want to build?
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> Nick Poole
> Chief Executive
> MDA
>
> www.mda.org.uk
> www.collectionslink.org.uk
>
>
>
> Tel: 01223 316028
> Fax: 01223 364658
>
> MDA (Europe) Ltd: Company Registration No: 1300565
> Reg. Office: 22 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 1JP.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> electronic museum
> Sent: 27 March 2008 12:31
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: The speculative aspect of using Web 2 [was: British Postal
> Museum & Archive Wiki]
>
> Oof. So much to respond to and so little time.
>
> In brief..I think we're in danger of making some fairly classic museum
> type
> generalisations, about "what people want" "what they need" "what they
> might
> want if we showed it to them"..
>
> More importantly we're also *still* (after all these years...) thinking in
> terms of "a flowable, understandable, linear user experience" through "our
> website". This is NOT (repeat...) how the web works any more. I'm not sure
> it ever was, tbh, and that's why we (as a sector) have often found
> ourselves building things which ought to be popular, but aren't. It's also
> why some of the things we didn't expect to be popular actually turned out
> to
> be huge!
>
> Let's take Twitter as one example in a field of hundreds. Mode of use is
> probably NOT "hey, a museum on Twitter, I'll follow it". Mode of use
> probably IS "I've seen something interesting which HAPPENS to be on a
> museum
> website and I'll post it to Twitter...". Result - clicks, visibility - a
> good thing at least as far as funders are concerned. <insert argument here
> />
>
> People are fickle; the web is loosely coupled; users get whatever it is
> they're looking for (and some things they didn't know they were looking
> for)
> wherever they can. A lot of your traffic IS NOT YOUR AUDIENCE but PEOPLE
> WHO
> HAPPENED UPON YOUR STUFF.
>
> So what does this mean to development of services? Predictably, it's
> complicated. There *has* to be an element of *push* (or we'd still be
> rolling out endless damn catalogues of boring stuff) but at the same time
> there also *has* to be an element of user testing, too.
>
> Here's where I am on this stuff - Groundhog day-like I notice I posted it
> following a similar MCG thread... http://tinyurl.com/yvpgmx :-)
> ta!
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Tehmina Goskar <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Nick. You are right in many senses. No one wants to waste
> money.
> > However I very much see many of these things in the same way as other
> > short
> > to medium-term ventures: temporary exhibitions, conferences, workshops
> and
> > other 'events'. For any longer term online sustainability and
> visibility
> > I
> > can't think of any better way to achieve this than to invest properly in
> > well-described collections-based and subject-based information that is
> > well
> > designed and detectable.
> >
> > Perhaps therefore we also need to add longevity aims to this equation?
> A
> > sandbox sounds interesting though I wonder if some may prefer just to go
> > for
> > it? I have no opinion on this either way but I feel very strongly that
> > the
> > more people exchange their experiences, the better informed others will
> > be.
> > No project is directly transferrable but lessons learnt certainly are.
> >
> > As for twitter specifically, I don't use it as I don't want to tell
> people
> > what I am doing every few moments (though it is all extremely
> interesting
> > of
> > course) nor do I wish to know what others are doing. However would some
> > event at a museum be well-served with a twitter-esque application?
> > Perhaps
> > it would. Therefore such things can also help aid creative problem
> > solving
> > at a relatively negligible cost.
> >
> > And I wonder where the prejudice against the Siliconites comes from? If
> > we
> > look within our own broad community, we all do and think of things in
> > different ways, we wouldn't all want to be thought of in the same way,
> > surely? Can we ever say we've reached the 'wrong' audience when doing
> > stuff
> > on the web?
> >
> > Tehmina
> >
> > On 27/03/2008, Nick Poole <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tehmina,
> > >
> > > Thanks for a very interesting and balanced post. I think you are
> correct
> > -
> > > there is an element of exploration involved here, which is obviously
> an
> > > important part of innovation. My concern with these things has always
> > been
> > > the risk of a large number of museums investing in basically
> > unsustainable
> > > services which do little to support their core mission.
> > >
> > > On the subject of Twitter, you ask which museum wouldn't want the
> brief
> > > attention of a million people. Firstly, it is highly unlikely that of
> > this
> > > million claimed users, more than a couple of tens of thousands are
> > *really*
> > > active users (it's the same issue with Second Life's claimed
> > population).
> > > This really is a niche market, and my answer would be that even a
> > million
> > > brief viewers is of little use at all if it's the *wrong* million, or
> if
> > our
> > > information is lost in a torrent of in-jokes and Silicon Valley
> startup
> > > party invites.
> > >
> > > We need to think hard about which problems we are going to try and
> > solve,
> > > and then identify the best technologies to do so. Imagine a world in
> > which
> > > Twitter did not exist (give it a couple of years...) would you really
> > invent
> > > a constantly-updated trivia machine as the best way of communicating
> > with
> > > museum audiences?
> > >
> > > I'm willing to bet that you wouldn't.
> > >
> > > Which takes us back to your original proposition - how do museums find
> > the
> > > time and money to play with innovative/speculative services, even
> where
> > > these don't necessarily resolve to long-term changes in the way we do
> > > things? I know that Eduserv were looking at investing in a
> > sandbox/incubator
> > > in which museums could muck about with stuff. I think there is real
> > > potential in having a safe 'playground' in which to test these
> > propositions
> > > before they become live services. Is this something which people would
> > find
> > > appealing?
> > >
> > >
> > > Nick
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Nick Poole
> > > Chief Executive
> > > MDA
> > >
> > > www.mda.org.uk
> > > www.collectionslink.org.uk
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tel: 01223 316028
> > > Fax: 01223 364658
> > >
> > > MDA (Europe) Ltd: Company Registration No: 1300565
> > > Reg. Office: 22 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 1JP.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >
> > > From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > > Tehmina Goskar
> > > Sent: 27 March 2008 10:23
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: The speculative aspect of using Web 2 [was: British
> Postal
> > > Museum & Archive Wiki]
> > >
> > > There is also, of course, the speculative aspect of using web 2
> methods
> > to
> > > either solicit user response or get them to create information for you
> > or
> > > spread your information elsewhere. As both Mike and Nick note, every
> > > organisation and project has specific needs and aims and these are the
> > > things that should come first. However I wonder if many organisations
> > big
> > > and small are using social networking tools and related applications
> in
> > a
> > > speculative way - to see what happens. This may result in
> > 'interactions'
> > > far beyond expectations or more modest ones but certainly quite often
> > > unexpected ones.
> > >
> > > Many of us who have used flickr, for example, have done so with a
> desire
> > > simply to share information with no specific view on _who_ we should
> > share
> > > these things with. As an individual, I have done the same and have
> been
> > > quite surprised at some of the interest in my photographs, e.g. for a
> > > southern American recipe book, for a citizenship website, for an
> > > alternative
> > > health documentary, for a popular archaeological textbook... some have
> > > also
> > > been shared on enthusiasts websites including one on manhole covers.
> I
> > > did
> > > not seek any of these outcomes - and certainly did not expect
> > > them. Museums
> > > and heritage organisations who do the same will likewise not always
> know
> > > how
> > > such things will turn out.
> > >
> > > A propos the previous post on the critique of apps such as twitter, a
> > > million people may not be a big number for Oracle or Cisco but which
> > > museum
> > > online or otherwise would not want a million people's attention,
> however
> > > brief, on their collections and information? The technology is also
> > > reciprocal. It's not all about what our audiences will get out of it
> > but
> > > what _we_ can get out of it too.
> > >
> > > There is, for sure, a horses for courses basic rule to using web
> > > applications to increase awareness of your organisation and its
> > > information
> > > but there is also a speculative aspect which, it seems to me, is
> > important
> > > -
> > > there is also an element of this to putting on temporary exhibitions -
> > it
> > > is
> > > not always clear who will be interested in them and results can
> > sometimes
> > > be
> > > surprising. How you weigh up this speculation against time and
> resource
> > > costs is a more difficult matter to resolve. The choice just needs to
> > be
> > > well-informed.
> > >
> > > Tehmina
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 27/03/2008, Nick Poole <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Rhiannon,
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks for your email about the BPMA Wiki. I would be really
> > > > interested to know more about why the BPMA took the decision to
> > > implement a
> > > > Wiki. Is it something your online audience have been requesting? Is
> > > there a
> > > > specific target demographic for whom a Wiki is their preferred form
> of
> > > > interaction?
> > > >
> > > > The reason I ask is because of your comment about taking time to get
> > > > people on there. Of course, this may simply be the inertia faced by
> > any
> > > > fledgling service, but at the same time I am not sure whether this
> is
> > > > central to your mission or an incidental add-on.
> > > >
> > > > Not to be too negative about things, but (bearing in mind the recent
> > > > exchange between Frankie and Mike) I remain sceptical about the
> > > > appropriateness of models like social networking and participative
> > media
> > > to
> > > > the delivery of museums online. As Mike notes, there's no hard and
> > fast
> > > rule
> > > > - it's appropriate when it's appropriate - but I'd be really
> > interested
> > > to
> > > > know whether this is a case of 'because we can' or whether there is
> a
> > > > genuine audience/marketing driver behind this thing.
> > > >
> > > > Similarly, I'd be very interested to know more about the outcomes of
> > > your
> > > > dissertation - not just from a quantitative point of view (how many
> > > museums
> > > > are doing this), but also from a qualitative one (of those museums,
> > how
> > > may
> > > > are doing it well, and how many will still be an actively supported
> > > resource
> > > > in 2 years time).
> > > >
> > > > Of course, I see the potential of crowdsourcing interpretation and
> > > > selection, and the Wiki model certainly offers a potential channel
> for
> > > > people to get at the museums back-end systems, but I think we run
> the
> > > risk
> > > > of overlooking the very specific psychology and demographics of User
> > > > Generated Content, and regarding it as something appropriate for a
> > > > generalist audience.
> > > >
> > > > Any further info gratefully received!
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Nick
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nick Poole
> > > > Chief Executive
> > > > MDA
> > > >
> > > > www.mda.org.uk
> > > > www.collectionslink.org.uk
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tel: 01223 316028
> > > > Fax: 01223 364658
> > > >
> > > > MDA (Europe) Ltd: Company Registration No: 1300565
> > > > Reg. Office: 22 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 1JP.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of
> > > > Rhiannon Looseley
> > > > Sent: 26 March 2008 17:43
> > > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > > Subject: British Postal Museum & Archive Wiki
> > > >
> > > > Dear all
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I thought some of you might be interested in hearing about the new
> > > > British Postal Museum & Archive (BPMA) Wiki:
> > > > www.postalheritage.org.uk/wiki. It's based on Zwiki technology
> which
> > is
> > > > Zope/Plone developers' answer to Wiki technology.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's a bit of an experiment and at the moment, unsurprisingly, it's
> > > > taking a bit of time to get people on there. I've started a few
> > 'seeds'
> > > > to get people started. At the bottom of this email is an example of
> > the
> > > > email we sent out to our E-Newsletter mailing list to try and
> > encourage
> > > > people to contribute. It gives you an example of some of the seeds
> > > > we're using at the moment. We've created similar flyers and
> > newsletter
> > > > articles as well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I would be interested in hearing any suggestions others might have
> on
> > > > topics we could use to get people started and also experiences of
> > > > building up a community like this. I'm particularly keen to find
> ways
> > > > of making the most of Wikis' potential for collaborative work.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Also if you're interested, I'm currently writing my MA in Museum
> > Studies
> > > > Dissertation on Museum Wikis, with ours as a case study. I'm
> blogging
> > > > about my progress at: http://rhiannonlooseley.blogspot.com if anyone
> > is
> > > > interested in following my progress. I'd welcome any comments along
> > the
> > > > way (please let me know if you specifically don't want me to quote
> > your
> > > > comments, either on my blog, or by email, in my dissertation).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes,
> > > >
> > > > Rhiannon Looseley
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Rhiannon Looseley
> > > >
> > > > Web Officer
> > > >
> > > > Tel: 020 7239 2588
> > > >
> > > > Fax: 020 7239 2576
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [log in to unmask]
> > > > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> > > >
> > > > The British Postal Museum & Archive (BPMA)
> > > >
> > > > Freeling House, Phoenix Place, London WC1X 0DL
> > > >
> > > > www.postalheritage.org.uk <http://www.postalheritage.org.uk/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > British postal communications helped to shape the modern world. The
> > > > British Postal Museum & Archive illuminates the lives of people in
> the
> > > > Post Office, the messages carried by Royal Mail, the history we all
> > > > share. Our history through the post.
> > > >
> > > > The BPMA is the public identity of the Postal Heritage Trust.
> > > >
> > > > Registered as a charity in England and Wales.
> > > > Registered Charity Number 1102360
> > > > Company Number 4896056
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Family History Research
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Researching your postal ancestors? Want to share what you've
> > discovered
> > > > with a wider audience? Why not use the Wiki to tell others about
> your
> > > > research?
> > > >
> > > > Use the Wiki Family history research
> > > > <http://www.massmailer.co.uk/go.php?RKKH2J8JU8N459OE7Q6963B7UOK4YSTV
> >
> > > > page to get started.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Postal History
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you know a lot about a certain aspect of postal history? Have you
> > > > uncovered a particularly interesting story in our archive? Why not
> > tell
> > > > us more about them on the Wiki?
> > > >
> > > > Use the Wiki Postal history
> > > > <http://www.massmailer.co.uk/go.php?RKKH2J8JU8N459OEYMPO78SIJ7MY0JO3
> >
> > > > page to get started.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Working with our collections
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Did you/do you work for the Post Office? Do you recognise some of
> the
> > > > objects and documents in our Collections section
> > > > <http://www.massmailer.co.uk/go.php?RKKH2J8JU8N459OE0QP7O71MVGI0PIQW
> >
> > ?
> > > > Why not tell us about what it was/is like to work with them?
> > > >
> > > > Use the Wiki Working with our collections
> > > > <http://www.massmailer.co.uk/go.php?RKKH2J8JU8N459OEBHDGUI0DHZ2L69O7
> >
> > > > page to get started.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Working for the Post Office
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Did you/do you work for the Post Office or Royal Mail? Tell us about
> > > > your experiences on the Wiki.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think has changed over the years? We'd be interested to
> > hear
> > > > what you think.
> > > >
> > > > Use the Wiki Working for the Post Office
> > > > <http://www.massmailer.co.uk/go.php?RKKH2J8JU8N459OECZXA1DOTRLJIRJAD
> >
> > > > to get started.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Letter boxes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you have a digital image of a particularly interesting letter
> box?
> > > > Why not upload your image to the Wiki and tell us more about it.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a letter box near you that you would like to know more
> about?
> > > > Maybe someone else out there can help you with your query. You could
> > > > post a question on the Wiki.
> > > >
> > > > Use the Wiki Letter boxes
> > > > <http://www.massmailer.co.uk/go.php?RKKH2J8JU8N459OE789FM2I4ZDYIV491
> >
> > > > page to get started.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > War Memorials in the Post Office
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Have you noticed a War Memorial in your local Post Office? Please
> help
> > > > us compile our database of Post Office War Memorials.
> > > >
> > > > Use our Wiki War Memorials in the Post Office
> > > > <http://www.massmailer.co.uk/go.php?RKKH2J8JU8N459OETUG225U1E5M98XFF
> >
> > > > page to get started.
> > > >
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **************************************************
> > > > For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list,
> visit
> > > the
> > > > website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
> > > > **************************************************
> > > >
> > > > **************************************************
> > > > For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list,
> visit
> > > the
> > > > website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
> > > > **************************************************
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tehmina Goskar, MA AMA
> > > [log in to unmask]
> > >
> > > Web Communication Development for Culture, Heritage and Academia
> > > Museum Specialist
> > > Historian
> > >
> > > **************************************************
> > > For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit
> > the
> > > website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
> > > **************************************************
> > >
> > > **************************************************
> > > For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit
> > the
> > > website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
> > > **************************************************
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tehmina Goskar, MA AMA
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Web Communication Development for Culture, Heritage and Academia
> > Museum Specialist
> > Historian
> >
> > **************************************************
> > For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit
> the
> > website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
> > **************************************************
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ________________________________________________
>
> electronic museum
>
> ..thoughts on museums, the social web, innovation
>
> w: http://www.electronicmuseum.org.uk
> f: http://electronicmuseum.wordpress.com/feed
> e: [log in to unmask]
>
> **************************************************
> For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit the
> website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
> **************************************************
>
> **************************************************
> For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit the
> website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
> **************************************************
>
--
**************************************************
For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit the website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
**************************************************
|