> >But the more general question is whether the extra horizontal
> >row(s) should remain. It sounds like you would prefer that and I'm not
> >sure if Tim intentionally didn't want that or (more likely) this is just
> >an unexpected side effect. (He's not here today.)
>
> It would be a nice feature for handling e.g. CA, CB & CO triple resonance
> data. I think we've discussed it before, but I think Tim maybe has some
> major alterations to the sequential assignment tool(s) coming up, or at
> least in mind?
>
Just wanted to chime in to agree with Brian -- having "sticky" extra horizontal
rows (esp. for CO, but also for Ca vs Cb) would be extremely helpful. We
add them manually, but need to reset them for each step through the
peak list, and need to position CO, etc each time as well. Seems a
little more tedious than it needs to be.
PS - Brian, thanks for the macro!
- Mark
--
______________________________________________________________
Mark Girvin
Biochemistry Department [log in to unmask]
Albert Einstein College of Medicine Tel:(718) 430-2025/2021
1300 Morris Park Ave. FAX:(718) 430-8565
Bronx, NY 10461 http://www.bioc.aecom.yu.edu/labs/girvlab
______________________________________________________________
|