I would use all the data myself and report that the model was built from a
a dataset with 74% completeness in the 2.25 to 2.15 Anngstrom shell. I
would not put the number 2.15 A in the manuscript title nor in the poster
title.
For me the acceptable completeness is 90% in the highest resolution shell
for the number to get in the title. You will know I reviewed your
paper if you see my telltale reviewer comment. You can put whatever you
want in the PDB deposition field.
Jim
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Melody Lin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have always been wondering... for a data set diffracting to say
> 2.15Angstrom but in the highest resolution shell (
> 2.25-2.15) the completeness is 74%, should I use merge all the data and call
> it a 2.15 A dataset or I should cut the data set to say 2.25 A where the
> highest resolution shell has better completeness (>85%)? What is an
> acceptable completeness value for the highest resolution shell?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Melody
>
|