JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  March 2008

CCP4BB March 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: refmac,tlsanl vs TLS, B and anisou

From:

Paul Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Paul Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:23:56 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (86 lines)

Some comments:

- We (the PHENIX developers) are working with the PDB to come up with  
a more
   streamlined deposition of TLS information for PHENIX. There are  
some other
   issues that need to be resolved first that have slowed this down a  
little.
- I am in agreement with George (not unusual).
- As far as I remember Garib was supportive of the idea of no longer  
depositing
   residual B-factors in the atomic iso-B column.
- What phenix.refine writes in the PDB file is almost exactly the  
same as you
   would get by running TLSANL on a REFMAC PDB file.
- It is my understanding that the EBI runs TLSANL on REFMAC deposited  
PDB files
   to extract the ANISOU records so that R-factors can be calculated.  
It would
   seems that this information is then discarded. [I could be  
mistaken about this
   whole process though]
- Allowing ANISOU records only when atomic anisotropic displacement  
parameters
   have been refined seems very restrictive. There may be multiple  
ways to arrive
   at anisotropic displacements other than the traditional method  
(TLS is one,
   George mentioned TLS restraints instead of constraints, and we  
have some ideas
   about ADP refinement that would also result in anisotropic  
displacements).
- It is good to remember that TLS refinement is constrained anisotropic
   displacement parameter refinement.
- If we want bioinformaticians to analyze our structures then we  
should be
   writing something in the iso-B column that they can understand - I  
favour the
   iso-B equivalent of the total atomic B-factor. This I assume they can
   handle. I very much doubt that anyone other than a  
crystallographer will go
   to the trouble of extracting the TLS information and recalculating  
atomic
   displacements.
- The biologists looking at structures from the PDB do not care about  
TLS or
   ANISOU records. If they choose to look at anything it will be the  
iso-B
   column (probably by colouring the atoms by B-factor in a display  
program).
   I'd like to give them a fighting chance of seeing something  
meaningful such
   as the iso-B equivalent of the total atomic B-factor rather than a  
residual
   B-factor (which has no meaning to them).
- I will not be holding my breath waiting for any of the popular  
display programs
   to start interpreting TLS header information.
- I agree that it is best for everyone if we have some clear  
standards for
   deposition and tags that make it clear to anyone looking at files  
from the
   PDB what is meant by the contents. The PDB is very aware of this  
and I expect
   things to be straightened out fairly soon in collaboration with  
the developers
   of phenix.refine and REFMAC.

-- 
Paul Adams
Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence  
Berkeley Lab
Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley
Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute
Head, Berkeley Center for Structural Biology

Building 64, Room 248
Tel: 510-486-4225, Fax: 510-486-5909
http://cci.lbl.gov/paul

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
1 Cyclotron Road
BLDG 64R0121
Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
--

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager