So Dave, does Imperial have static accounts defined for every member of every VO you support? That must be a b****r to maintain.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: "David Colling" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 22/02/08 12:09
Subject: Re: sgm/prd pool accounts
I must admit that i would be very nervous of using pool accounts for sgm
accounts (or anyother account come to that)
Gordon, JC (John) wrote:
> Duncan, are you confident that if multiple people use an sgm account at
> your site at the same time that you can satisfy the auditing
> requirements to know who did what?
>
> John
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Duncan Rand
>> Sent: 21 February 2008 16:12
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: sgm/prd pool accounts
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> At RHUL and QMUL we are installing new clusters and I am
>> coming across the thorny issue of sgm and prd pool accounts.
>> I see that the yaim instructions now state that "Note: static
>> accounts are not recommended".
>> When I did a quick poll of VO's they said yes we can deal
>> with pool sgm accounts but we prefer static sgm accounts. So
>> at RHUL I am planning to use pool prd accounts and static sgm
>> accounts. Has anybody got any comments?
>>
>> many thanks
>> Duncan
>>
|