a great concept. though I don't see it in the poem
KS
On 22/02/2008, TheOldMole <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Stevens.
>
> For me, it more or less had to do with a world in which no one is after
> you, but there's still no safety.
>
>
> kasper salonen wrote:
> > the opening is familiar, it's not Stevens or Hughes is it? if it is,
> > the third like is a good twist that introduces the second stanza.
> >
> > that said I have zero idea what the abstract assertion of st.2 means
> >
> > KS
> >
> > On 22/02/2008, TheOldMole <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> IN THE FIELD
> >>
> >> The only thing moving
> >> is the eye of the blackbird
> >> and it's not moving either
> >>
> >> we avoid surveillance
> >> by gathering around us
> >> the detritus of absence
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tad Richards
> >> http://www.opus40.org/tadrichards/
> >> http://opusforty.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >> The moral is this: in American verse,
> >> The better you are, the pay is worse.
> >> --Corey Ford
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Tad Richards
> http://www.opus40.org/tadrichards/
> http://opusforty.blogspot.com/
>
> The moral is this: in American verse,
> The better you are, the pay is worse.
> --Corey Ford
>
|