Ian Young wrote:
> That's right; until there are some SAML 2 SPs to talk to out there the
> SAML 1 locations are of more interest than the SAML 1 ones.
>
> Obviously we're developing our knowledge of Shib 2 at this point (I'm
> in the middle of a test deployment myself) and we're aware that the
> procedure we have doesn't gather everything of interest for Shib 2.
> What I'd suggest, therefore, is follow the published procedure as near
> as you can but prominently flag the fact that you're doing a 2.0
> install so that we can then contact you directly and ask you to send
> us the additional information. The easiest way to do that is probably
> going to send us the metadata that was auto-generated by the IdP
> install: although we'll need to tweak it a fair bit it is a pretty
> good starting point.
Many thanks Ian; I'll send our metadata along with the request.
Nick
|