Thank you, that appears to work great!
On Feb 4, 2008 7:24 AM, Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi - the precision you need depends on exactly what comparison you are
> making. It's probably better to start by using fslmaths to (e.g.)
> subjtract two images that you wish to compare, and then use FSLView
> and fslstats to get a feel for what's in the difference image.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> On 1 Feb 2008, at 16:59, Ben Mayer wrote:
>
> > For a school project I am doing some optimization work on FSL,
> > specifically xfibers.
> >
> > One of the things that I need to do is be able to compare the output
> > from the original program to the optimized program to make sure they
> > are the same. I found the fsl2ascii tool that appears to allow for
> > easy output of data in human readable format. It would not be a big
> > deal to build a script using the output from fsl2ascii to compare two
> > datasets to see if the answer is the same. I noticed that fsl2ascii
> > outputs 7 significant digits.
> >
> > What I am wondering is if 7 significant digits is all that is needed?
> > Is less precision acceptable?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ben
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
> Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
>
> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
> +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
> [log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
|