That was a good suggestion. I just found out that it was the case. How
would you have transformed the mask into a 1mm resolution?
Siterer Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>:
> Hi Hallvard -
> Can we just check that you are sure you used this standard image when
> you ran the 1st level analyses.
> For example, you didn't select the 1mm standard brain by mistake?
>
> Cheers
>
> T
>
>
> On 15 Feb 2008, at 13:52, Hallvard Røe Evensmoen wrote:
>
>> Thanks for quick answear. I don`t know. The data for the standard
>> space image and the self-made mask are here:
>> pintzka@linux-sopg:/media/ubuntu/Navigasjon/ROI_masks> fslinfo
>> MNI152_T1_2mm_brain
>> data_type INT16
>> dim1 91
>> dim2 109
>> dim3 91
>> dim4 1
>> datatype 4
>> pixdim1 2.0000000000
>> pixdim2 2.0000000000
>> pixdim3 2.0000000000
>> pixdim4 1.0000000000
>> cal_max 8000.0000
>> cal_min 3000.0000
>> file_type NIFTI-1+
>> pintzka@linux-sopg:/media/ubuntu/Navigasjon/ROI_masks> fslinfo
>> MTL-mask_square2_bilateral
>> data_type INT16
>> dim1 91
>> dim2 109
>> dim3 91
>> dim4 1
>> datatype 4
>> pixdim1 2.0000000000
>> pixdim2 2.0000000000
>> pixdim3 2.0000000000
>> pixdim4 0.0000000000
>> cal_max 1.0000
>> cal_min 0.0000
>> file_type NIFTI-1+
>>
>> Siterer Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>>> Sounds to me as if your self-made mask was not the same size as the
>>> standard space image you are using.
>>>
>>> Your results will be in this space, and therefore so should your mask be.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> T
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15 Feb 2008, at 13:26, Hallvard Røe Evensmoen wrote:
>>>
>>>> When trying to use a self-made binary MTL mask on a third level
>>>> analysis in FSL, we got this error message:
>>>> /usr/local/fsl/bin/fslmaths thresh_zstat1 -mas
>>>> /media/ubuntu/Navigasjon/ROI_masks/MTL-mask_square2_bilateral.nii.gz
>>>> thresh_zstat1
>>>> Image Exception : #3 :: Attempted to multiply images/ROIs of
>>>> different sizes
>>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'RBD_COMMON::BaseException'
>>>>
>>>> And the output were as if we not had used any mask at all....
>>>>
>>>> Anyone got any suggestions about what might have gone wrong?, and we
>>>> would be grateful to hear.
>>>>
>>>> Hallvard Røe Evensmoen
>>>>
>>
|