I have a research that dug up an old study and doesn't want to "rock
the boat" by changing versions.
I didn't quite realize it was that old, I can suggest he try his
designs in 3.2 which we still have a working version of laying around.
-james
On Feb 27, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Mark Jenkinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a *very* old version (from 2003).
> Why do you want to use it?
>
> All the best,
> Mark
>
>
> James wrote:
>> Is there an archive repository for older versions of FSL?
>> Specifically 3.1?
>>
>> -james
>>
|