Thanks for quick answear. I don`t know. The data for the standard
space image and the self-made mask are here:
pintzka@linux-sopg:/media/ubuntu/Navigasjon/ROI_masks> fslinfo
MNI152_T1_2mm_brain
data_type INT16
dim1 91
dim2 109
dim3 91
dim4 1
datatype 4
pixdim1 2.0000000000
pixdim2 2.0000000000
pixdim3 2.0000000000
pixdim4 1.0000000000
cal_max 8000.0000
cal_min 3000.0000
file_type NIFTI-1+
pintzka@linux-sopg:/media/ubuntu/Navigasjon/ROI_masks> fslinfo
MTL-mask_square2_bilateral
data_type INT16
dim1 91
dim2 109
dim3 91
dim4 1
datatype 4
pixdim1 2.0000000000
pixdim2 2.0000000000
pixdim3 2.0000000000
pixdim4 0.0000000000
cal_max 1.0000
cal_min 0.0000
file_type NIFTI-1+
Siterer Tim Behrens <[log in to unmask]>:
> Sounds to me as if your self-made mask was not the same size as the
> standard space image you are using.
>
> Your results will be in this space, and therefore so should your mask be.
>
> Cheers
>
> T
>
>
> On 15 Feb 2008, at 13:26, Hallvard Røe Evensmoen wrote:
>
>> When trying to use a self-made binary MTL mask on a third level
>> analysis in FSL, we got this error message:
>> /usr/local/fsl/bin/fslmaths thresh_zstat1 -mas
>> /media/ubuntu/Navigasjon/ROI_masks/MTL-mask_square2_bilateral.nii.gz
>> thresh_zstat1
>> Image Exception : #3 :: Attempted to multiply images/ROIs of different sizes
>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'RBD_COMMON::BaseException'
>>
>> And the output were as if we not had used any mask at all....
>>
>> Anyone got any suggestions about what might have gone wrong?, and we
>> would be grateful to hear.
>>
>> Hallvard Røe Evensmoen
>>
|