JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Archives


ACCESSIBUILT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT Home

ACCESSIBUILT  February 2008

ACCESSIBUILT February 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Accessible housing standards and monitoring availability

From:

Jane Simpson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accessibuilt list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:36:23 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (226 lines)

For information the Pocklington Trust is just embarking on some research
around the lighting needs of people with visual impairments in their own
homes. This is just starting up so don’t inundate them with
questions/queries. I am currently putting together my views on the way to
influence the process and would welcome any good examples and suggestions of
future legislative and regulatory changes.

Regards Jane


Jane Simpson
T:  01484 413000
M: 07777607239
www.janesimpsonaccess.com
 

This e-mail is for the addressee only. The information contained in it
and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately. You are not
authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute or retain this
e-mail or any part of it. 

 


-----Original Message-----
From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Flick Harris
Sent: 25 February 2008 11:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Accessible housing standards and monitoring availability

We also think in Manchester that it is the intention to include it 
into future Part M Building Regs.

We are very aware of the Lifetimes Homes concept in Manchester but 
are very unhappy with the vague standards and lack of clear 
specifications and from some informal research I did before giving a 
talk last year to a, occupational therapists' group, found that most 
of the organisations promoting Lifetime Homes get calls from 
developers trying to avoid them, and usually only implementing some 
of them, as they are not specific enough.

Our Design for Access 2 manual (policy not just guidance for the City 
Council) has more specific specifications for housing included. These 
are currently being used in all (or some) of the PFI and Housing 
Market Renewal projects in Manchester and the developers don't seem 
to have any problems with them. The residents are delighted with the 
better space!

We raised these issues at a meeting during the Labour Party 
conference when it was in Manchester but CABE and the other people 
there weren't very interested.

I recommend that anyone interested has a look at our standards online at

http://www.mdpag.org.uk/pubs.htm

http://www.manchester.gov.uk/site/scripts/documents_info.php?categoryID=2000
41&documentID=106&pageNumber=7

BTW, the City Council have recently changed their website and it now 
doesn't have alternative formats on the website, but if you contact 
the Planning Department, anyone who wants a Braille or large print 
version or on CD, please contact them directly.

We would be interested in any comments also from anyone as we are 
currently reviewing the standards which were published  a few years 
ago now (but still useful!)

There is another housing issue we have raised recently with the EHRC, 
the NW Regional Assembly and regularly with MCC which is that no-one 
is recording or montitoring how many accessible houses, flats etc are 
available around Manchester. This is even more difficult now that the 
housing stock has been transferred into housing trusts and at least 
one trust had a policy of only allocating accessible houses to people 
over 50 - not much good if you're a young disabled parent! There is 
no information about the private sector at all although other 
elements such as price etc are being monitored closely. We would be 
interested in knowing if anyone else knows of any procedure dealing 
with this in their area.

Best wishes

Flick



At 10:49 25/02/2008, you wrote:
>The Lifetime Homes concept has been around for quite a while now, and
>I'm wondering if the government has been watching it's progress as part
>of the 'London Plan', using as it does a percentage system whereby new
>homes are built as 100% lifetime homes compliant with 10% of these being
>wheelchair accessible.
>
>I've been trying to build it into policy here for some years now, and
>the general concensus is that if it is enforced through Building
>Regulations it would be more effective than putting it into housing
>policies.
>
>I'm all too aware of the building industry not wanting the 16 points
>built into home and I would be concerned about the plaintive:
>
>"All new social housing built from 2011 will have to be built to the new
>"lifetime homes" standard, and the hope is that private sector houses
>will also meet it." (BBC's website)
>
>It is also disappointing that it is mentioned only in regards to elderly
>people, when we all know the benefit that such building criteria would
>extend to others. Essentially the building industry do not want us to
>stay put in one house, they want us to move around buying new housing as
>our needs change.
>
>I do believe the way forward would be to enhance the Building
>Regulations in order to incorporate the 16 points of the Lifetime Homes
>concept. If it is the regulatory way housing is built then there are
>fewer loopholes or exemptions.
>
>Rob
>
>_______________________________________________
>Rob Bracewell BA (Hons)
>Access Officer,
>Forward Planning Team,
>Planning Services,
>Lancaster City Council,
>Palatine Hall,
>Dalton Square,
>Lancaster,
>LA1 1PW
>Tel. & Minicom. 01524 582372 (please use announcer)
>Mob. 07820736997
>Fax. 01524 582322
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>Of Brian Towers
>Sent: 25 February 2008 10:32
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [ACCESSIBUILT] Age friendly housing
>
>Marcus
>
>It appears to be a slight extension of the Part M stuff.
>
>Level entrances, wheelchair turning space, ground floor WC, wider stair
>to take a stair lift! Hopefully, larger bathrooms and WCs.
>
>I'll see what else there is.
>
>
>Brian
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>Of Marcus Ormerod
>Sent: 25 February 2008 09:53
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Age friendly housing
>
>Hi everyone
>
>there seems to be a news article this morning about UK government
>suggesting we should have age-friendly housing - apart from this being a
>deja vu experience does anyone know any detail about what legislation or
>regulation there are actually proposing. Or is this just the government
>trying to deflect the media spotlight off them?
>
>The BBC news item is at the link below:
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7260000/newsid_7262100/7262120.s
>tm?b
>w=bb&mp=wm&asb=1&news=1&bbcws=1
>
>Professor Marcus Ormerod
>SURFACE Inclusive Design Research Centre SOBE, The University of Salford
>4th Floor Maxwell Building Salford
>M5 4WT
>Tel (0)161 295 5405
>Fax (0)161 295 5011
>Mobile 07887 556425
>www.surface.salford.ac.uk
>
>----------End of Message----------
>Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
>distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme
>visit:
>http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
>Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
>
>----------End of Message----------
>Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
>distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme
>visit:
>http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
>Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>    UK businesses use up 2 million tonnes of paper each year. Think before
>    you print this email - do you really need to? Thank you. DISCLAIMER:
>    DISCLAIMER:
>
>----------End of Message----------
>Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the 
>distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
>http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
>Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at 
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
January 2023
November 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager