>
>>>As I stated to Ben: OTO is a legal entity. Others have produced no
>>>documentation to support their claims of lineage", "current" or
>>>"offshoot". This argument got old in the 1990s. If you wish to speak of
>>>well-researched studies, by all means.
> If you need to continue to discuss claims made by people who ceased making
> those claims long, long ago, count me out.<<
this is an academic list, and I think I am paraphrasing dear old (the late)
Robert Anton Wilson when I write that there is a difference between a
mathematical proof, a scientific proof, a legal proof, a theological proof
and a merely plausible argument, so discussion of various claims and counter
claims do have a place here
something I've never heard much about, and would be v interested in, is the
brief meetings between Kenneth Grant and Grady McMurty in Britain in 1944
and possibly 1945, when they were both visiting Crowley, for example, and
how they viewed the control of the OTO at that point
dave e
|