Bearing in mind D.E.'s comment re academic discussion...
In what sense do you mean a 'legal' entity. Do you mean an incorporated
organisation?
You can reply off list (if you wish) if it is more appropriate.
All the best
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Felicia" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] Witchcraft/Nature worship talk.
Midlands, England.
> On Feb 4, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Caduceus Books wrote:
>
>> I would expect to find male homosexual traditions in Michael Bertiaux's
>> OTOA, a relative of the OTO.
>
> Is Michael Bertiaux still operating something he's calling "OTOA"? I
> thought he quit claiming connections
> to OTO 15 to 20 years ago.
>
>> Of course there will be some who are partisan to the administration of
>> the Caliphate OTO who would be anxious to assert that these are not true
>> OTO's but there is an agenda here which I do not share.
>
> What agenda?
> OTO is a legal entity.
> Others have produced no documentation to support their claims of
> "lineage", "current" or "offshoot".
> This argument got old in the 1990s. I am finished, here. If you wish to
> speak of well-researched studies, by all means.
> If you need to continue to discuss claims made by people who ceased making
> those claims long, long ago, count me out.
>
> Felicia Swayne-Heidrick
|