Hubbard Bill wrote:
> Does this agree with other colleagues' experience? Is a p-r field
> required to facilitate future use of the material?
The flip-side of this argument goes thus:
If the p-r field is required, should a Repository not accept any ingest
where that field is not present?
For example, I am looking at ways of harvesting via Google Scholar, but
GS does not hold p-r details. Should I do something like only accept
deposits that are sourced from known journal repositories?
(I'd also be interested in how many repositories *currently* support the
p-r field?)
--
Ian Stuart
|