Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
>>Nevertheless, from Xavi tests, his jobs failed both at
>>ce02.lip.pt and
>>ce101.cern.ch when submitted from the same UI as his pilot jobs.
>> From standard UI everything is OK at both CEs. This points
>>to something
>>incorrect in the pilot jobs UI which prevents things to properly
>>interact with lcg-CE gLite 3.1.
>
>
> I don't think so, I doubt the pilot jobs are being submitted with globus-job-run! I still think the most likely case is that you're seeing errors related to an old proxy with the expired AC and not the newly-created one. (If the jobs go through a WMS, is it using a single delegated proxy, and if so was it replaced?)
Condor-G on the WMS uses a single master proxy per DN+FQAN,
for which AFAIK it takes a fresh proxy every once in a while,
so it would be possible for a job to get submitted to the CE
with a different proxy than the one used to submit it to the
WMS itself. This may have confused the analysis of the errors
that were observed.
> PS I seem to remember that proxy renewal on the WMS only looked at the overal proxy lifetime and not the ACs, although I don't know if that's still true.
That bug is still open indeed:
https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/index.php?28167
|