Hi,
I was planning to upgrade to the dCache p4 patch at the start of next week then enable space tokens at that point (anyone have a good recipe for that yet?) but as it appears that the p4 patch dCache breaks smrcp I'll probably hold off for p5 ( or 6 or 7 or ... ).
Chris.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GRIDPP2: Deployment and support of SRM and local
> storage management [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Graeme Stewart
> Sent: 31 January 2008 16:20
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: T2 SRM2 Readiness for ATLAS
>
> Can I poll ATLAS T2s as to their readiness for SRM2.2 in CCRC?
>
> This means updating your SE to the right patch level for CCRC
> (https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/GSSDCCRCBaseVersions) and
> defining at least 3TB in the ATLASDATADISK space token, writeable by
> atlas.
>
> Glasgow are ready (see http://scotgrid.blogspot.com/2008/01/srm22-
> configuration-for-fdrccrc.html), but it would be very good if we got
> our other bigger T2s ready too: Lancaster, Manchester, Liverpool,
> Oxford, RHUL, RALPP - but of course open to all ATLAS sites...
>
> If you can let me know what your status is, and when you
> expect to be
> ready, I would be grateful - there is some ATLAS specific
> configuration which needs to be made to use your new SRM2
> configuration.
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On 30 Jan 2008, at 15:38, Greig Alan Cowan wrote:
>
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > Thanks for this, it's good information. This matches up with the
> > information I posted last week:
> >
> > - 2 TB for ATLASDATADISK
> > - 1 TB for ATLASENDUSER (better with 2 TB)
> > - 1 TB for ATLASMCDISK (better with 2 TB)
> > - 1 TB for ATLASGRPXXX
> >
> > Where the XXX is taken from your list below. It looks like we
> > should also move the ATLASDATADISK from 2 to 3TB (going by
> Graeme's
> > earlier posting).
> >
> > Greig
> >
> > On 30/01/08 15:32, brian davies wrote:
> >> As promised, this is a forward of the mail thread regarding Tier2
> >> group space tokens for atlas. I would make the suggestion that for
> >> FDRs and CCRC we try atr least 2? TOP at GLASGOW and
> BEAUTY at Lancs?
> >> Who are the active Users involved in FDRs and CCRC and
> what data are
> >> they looking at?
> >> ( Lancaster is involved with beauty, hence that suggestion and i
> >> think
> >> graeme suggested TOP for GLASGOW.) may want to try and have a site
> >> with multiple GROUPS assigned?
> >> Brian
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Solveig Albrand <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Date: 29 Jan 2008 11:20
> >> Subject: Re: List of Group names for Space tokens at Tier 2 sites
> >> To: Gilbert Poulard <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Cc: Dario Barberis <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Davies
> >> <[log in to unmask]>, atlas-project-adc-operations
> >> <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Thanks - I think our list IS up to date.
> >> Gilbert Poulard wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The list of existing groups is available from the VOMRS web page:
> >>> https://lcg-voms.cern.ch:8443/vo/atlas/vomrs
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Gilbert
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Dario Barberis
> >>> Sent: Tue 1/29/2008 11:46 AM
> >>> To: Brian Davies
> >>> Cc: atlas-project-adc-operations
> >>> Subject: Re: List of Group names for Space tokens at Tier 2 sites
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I don't know if this list has been explicitly
> distributed, but
> >>> for
> >>> sure it must be the same ast the list of VOMS groups the ATLAS
> >>> defined. Alessandro De Salvo may help here.
> >>>
> >>> Initially the list may be shorter for tests, but surely it will
> >>> have to be complete by the beginning of data-taking.
> >>>
> >>> The expectation is that every Tier-1 supports all
> activities (and
> >>> all groups). If this is too much, We'll have to assign groups to
> >>> tier-1s and break the symmetry.
> >>>
> >>> Each Tier-2 site will support only a (small?) subset. The
> >>> expectation is that all Tier-2s in the world will collectively
> >>> support all groups.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Dario
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 29 Jan 2008, at 11:36, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Does a list for the various space tokens for groups at
> Tier 2 sites
> >>>> exist?
> >>>> My assumption to start with we would have:
> >>>> TOP
> >>>> BPHYS
> >>>> SUSY
> >>>> HIGGS
> >>>> SM
> >>>> EXO
> >>>> PBPB
> >>>> MC
> >>>> Is this correct naming convention?
> >>>> Is the expectation that every Tier2 in a cloud will support all
> >>>> groups?
> >>>> That all Tier2s in a cloud will collectively support all groups?
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Brian
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> Dr Dario Barberis
> >>> CERN-PH Department Tel.: +41.22.767.1302
> >>> MailBox E25510 Fax.: +41.22.767.8350
> >>> CH-1211 Genève 23 (Switzerland)
> >>> ______________________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> *************************
> >> Solveig Albrand-Paget
> >> LPSC
> >> 53, Avenue des Martyrs
> >> 38026, GRENOBLE cedex,
> >> FRANCE
> >> *******************
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >> Tel: (+) (33) (0)4 76 28 41 25
> >> ********************
>
|