CRB checks are carried out here to protect our students. It isn't a
difficult process and does have the limitation that it is only
represents a snapshot of time, but but it is one extra way of trying to
safeguard under 18s, and people who may be preyed upon by unscrupulous
others. It does cost us of course. Most people might describe
themselves as vulnerable at some point in their lives. It isn't about
disempowering people. CRBs cannot protect an organisation from
accountability. It would be foolish to rely upon a CRB check as the
only measure of protection to be put in place.
Chris Q
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ian F.
Sent: 24 January 2008 01:40
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Safeguarding vulnerable adults within HE - best practice?
I suspect the motive behind requiring CRB checks is more to do with
perceived risk to the organisation, of being held accountable for the
actions of an individual member of staff. Sshould it come to court. the
organisation can claim to have taken reasonable steps to fulfill its
legal duties to protect students by arranging CRB checks, but might not
be held accountable if it doesn't provide funding for ongoing
supervision, training and support to staff or agency support workers
recruited on behalf of the institution to support students. Something
seems wrong there.
I have to say I'm still surprised how terminology like 'vulnerable
adults'
has been accepted without debate until now. When did it a disability
automatically make a person a 'vulnerable adult'? How does a student
feel when they're researching various prospective universities to find
out what kind of support they might be offered if they decide to study
there, to discover they're being referred to as a 'vulnerable adult' in
policy documents or online discussions?
Ian F.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Claire Wickham" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: Safeguarding vulnerable adults within HE - best practice?
To pick up on your suggestion Amanda that in HEIs "the risk is often
constructed as risk to the organisation only" - I'm not sure if this is
true as some of the discussions in HEIs are about CRB checking of staff
who come into (close/lone) contact with "vulnerable adults" and here the
risk is centred on the "vulnerable" student. ...
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 3213 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
|