> There's a way to avoid having to do this - use the "ADD" sub-keyword
> when processing in Mosflm, so that the batch number for each image
> data is given an offset; see
Nevertheless, it *is* a right-royal pain in the arse: you're cruising
at the synchrotron, crystal collecting and quietly (or noisily) dying,
you want a quick scale to know whether you have enough data from your
second batch .... and scala craps at you for having the repeating batch
number.
Can't the merging process (pointless; sortmtz) be made to spot that
batch numbers are repeating, and do an automatic add based on filename?
After all, batches from the same range *always* end up in the same
unmerged mtz file (or files with the same template).
At least, I was able to write a csh script to do it, and if you can do
it in csh, you can do it in anything... :)
phx.
|