Reply-To: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 11 Jan 2008 11:24:49 +0000618_US-ASCII pointless now does this Phil
On 11 Jan 2008, at 11:05, Frank von Delft wrote:
>> There's a way to avoid having to do this - use the "ADD" sub- >> keyword when processing in Mosflm, so that the batch number for >> each image data is given an offset; see > > Nevertheless, it *is* a right-royal pain in the arse: you're > cruising at the synchrotron, crystal collecting and quietly (or > noisily) dying, you want a quick scale to know whether you have > enough data from your second batch .... and scala craps at you for [...]43_11Jan200811:24:[log in to unmask] |