Hi Flavia
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:04 +0100, Flavia Donno wrote:
> Mario,
>
> Mario David wrote:
> > Hi Matias
> >
> > there seems to be a very quite misunderstanding here
> >
> > first off
> >
> > is dcache 1.7 supporting srm 2.2??
> >
> >
> dCache 1.7 only supports SRM v1.1 and SRM v2.1.
I know that,
> > is it supporting srm 2.0 or 2.1, was this ever put into production, or
> > activated somehow???
> >
> Only SRM v1.1 in dCache 1.7 is in production and is normally active.
> > depending on what people say here I will demonstrate the big confusion.
> >
> > cheers
so what does it mean site publishing
....8443/srm/managerv2....
take for example Lyon, it publishes the previous, and also
dn: GlueSEControlProtocolLocalID=srm_v2.2,GlueSEUniqueID=ccsrm.in2p3.fr
on the other hand, for example
# httpg://se01.athena.hellasgrid.gr:8443/srm/managerv2, HG-06-EKT
dn:
GlueSEControlProtocolLocalID=srm_v1,GlueSEUniqueID=se01.athena.hellasgrid
anyway, what is the correct thing to publish??
dn: GlueSEControlProtocolLocalID=srm_v1.1,
dn: GlueSEControlProtocolLocalID=srm_v1@
dn: GlueSEControlProtocolLocalID=srm_v1,
and for the 2(.2) version
dn: GlueSEControlProtocolLocalID=srm_v2.2,
dn: GlueSEControlProtocolLocalID=srm_v2,
dn: GlueSEControlProtocolLocalID=srm_v2@
so it seams a clarification is needed, specially from the yaim functions
and the glue schema.
cheers
Mario David
> >
> > Mario David
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 16:36 +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Gonçalo Borges wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Talking a little bit with other colleague (Mario David), he told me that SRM2
> >>> is already available in the majority of SE but not activated by default
> >>> in most of them....
> >>>
> >>> - Is this really the case?
> >>> - When is the production testbed start to use srm_v2 massevely?
> >>> - Is it easy to activate srm_v2 in present version of DPMs and dcache?
> >>>
> >> I think Mario perhaps confused the SRM2 protocol with one of the features
> >> possible with the SRM2 protocol (space reservations, which is a major and
> >> tricky reconfiguration of storage elements, which lots of side-effects).
> >>
> >> I would think that most places have srm protocol version 2 enabled, and
> >> this is a good thing because it enables lots of good stuff, like for
> >> example directory listings.
> >>
> >> /Mattias Wadenstein
> >>
|