Hello,
Is there a consensus about which program / data base most accurately reports Ramachandran
statistics? I believe that PROCHECK inaccurately flags outliers because the data base was compiled
many years ago, and there are now many more high resolution structures. Likewise I think I've heard
(no insults intended) that the Richardson library used by MOLPROBITY is a bit too generous?
What are people using currently to report Ramachandran statistics in papers?
Happy New Year - Mark
|