Hi Steve,
This is some info about our system. Is there anything that raises a flag for you or anything else we can try?
Thanks much!!
kemal@bliss:bin$ uname -a
> Linux bliss 2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Sep 25 02:16:15 EDT 2007
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> kemal@bliss:bin$ file /opt/fsl/bin/fslmaths
> /opt/fsl/bin/fslmaths: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64,
> version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, dynamically linked (uses
> shared libs), not stripped
> kemal@bliss:bin$ file /opt/fsl/bin/melodic
> /opt/fsl/bin/melodic: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64,
> version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, dynamically linked (uses
> shared libs), not stripped
Steve Smith wrote:
> Hi, thanks for sending the data.
>
> These datasets look fine in FSLView and when I click on "estimate from
> data" in FEAT (after selecting either of you files as the FEAT input
> data) it estimates new efficiency parameters (Noise leve, Temporal
> smoothness, Z threshold) without any problems after a minute or so of
> calculations.
>
> It's possible that you don't have a binary version of FSL that matches
> your computer/OS? Did you run FEEDS to test your installation of FSL?
>
> Cheers, Steve.
>
>
>
> On 20 Dec 2007, at 16:51, Vina Goghari wrote:
>
>> I get 0.000000 for both values from both commands. Thanks for
>> consulting!
>>
>>
>> Steve Smith wrote:
>>> Have you entered the data in the "data" tab?
>>> What happens if you type in the command line:
>>> $FSLDIR/bin/estnoise <your4Dinputdata>
>>> and then
>>> $FSLDIR/bin/estnoise <your4Dinputdata> 2.5 15 -1
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20 Dec 2007, at 16:03, Vina Goghari wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>> 0s appear when I press the estimate from data button for the
>>>> efficiency estimation for my data, which wasn't occuring for us
>>>> when using the previous version. Wondering what might be different?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Vina
>>>>
>>>> Steve Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure exactly what you are saying was zero - values
>>>>> appearing in the FEAT misc-tab GUI, or efficiency estimations?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 Dec 2007, at 12:33, Vina Goghari wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>>> Any idea of what I should look into? The data look normal in
>>>>>> MRICro and FSL runs on the images and gives what seem like
>>>>>> decent maps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Vina
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve Smith wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Probably.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2007, at 16:37, Vina Goghari wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> I'm using feat and using the estimate from data noise
>>>>>>>> efficiency and smoothness option. The values returned are
>>>>>>>> zero. Is that something to be concerned about?
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Vina
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
>>>>> Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
>>>>>
>>>>> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
>>>>> +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
>>>>> [log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
>>> Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
>>>
>>> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
>>> +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
>>> [log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
> Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
>
> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
> +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
> [log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
|