JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  December 2007

CCP4BB December 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Expired Crystallization Screening?

From:

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Artem Evdokimov <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:31:46 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (66 lines)

This is a tough question. Certainly, in an ideal world (and also in the
world that e.g. Hampton or Emerald salespeople would like us to live in) you
should replace expired reagents. The reality of course is that it's
sometimes quite costly to do so. It is also expensive (in terms of time and
effort) to not be able to reproduce your results - so there's always a
balance between price in dollars and price in human work.

Here are my two cents on this subject:

Any screens containing MES should be carefully checked. MES is notorious for
turning 'scary yellow' with time, and this yellowing is accompanied by a pH
shift. This is especially prominent if the solution was exposed to light.

Any screens containing PEGs should be checked, and the stock PEG solutions
should also be tested for pH change. Fresh PEG solutions have almost no
buffering power (they should have none, but there are always small amounts
of impurities) and their pH should be around 6 (or even better, 7). With age
PEGs tend to go acidic, see an earlier post on this subject.

Anything that contains organic material and "not too much salt" should be
looked at - bacterial or fungal contamination is always possible. At 4C it's
more likely to grow yeasts or molds, whereas at r.t. bacterial and fungal
growths are equally possible. Swirl the tubes - if you see something float
up - discard the tube.

Relatively few screening solutions are colored (iron, Ni, Cu, jeffamine, and
several other ingredients confer color). If a colorless solution went
colored - discard it.

On the other hand, stock solutions of inorganic, and some of the organic
salts are pretty stable, even at 5-year mark. With those, you have to watch
out for slow evaporation of water, because water can slowly migrate through
plastic. If your solutions have crystals in them, it's likely that they have
evaporated "somewhat". What you want to do with these is your choice - you
can attempt to dilute with ddH2O to the original volume, or you can relabel
as "saturated" (a problem, since at different temperatures the concentration
of stuff in solution changes).

Finally, it's good to remember that acetic acid and ammonia are volatile and
therefore ammonium salts and acetates can change with time in several
unpredictable ways. Solid NH4OAc or NH4Cl can (and do) sublime away right
from their jars (although NH4OAc tends to suck up water instead and become
acidic). 

Artem
-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ngo
Duc Tri
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:35 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [ccp4bb] Expired Crystallization Screening?

Dear CCP4 users,
I'm sorry for non-ccp4 question. My lab is using protein
crystalization screening from Hampton and Emerald. However I noticed
the Expires Date was 05/2002. That means we are using the too old
chemical.
Could I ask your experience about this problem? Should I need to
remove these expired screening because we still have many stocks.
Thank you for your reply.

My best regards,
TriNgo
PhD Student,
Sungkyunkwan University

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager