At 13:32 31/12/2007, you wrote:
>Julian Bradley <<In any case I'm not entirely sure of how far CPT
>Conservation or symmetry is regarded now, see
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_violation and elsewhere.>>
>
>I fear that you may have posted the wrong link, Julian, because the
>Wikipedia article to which you refer appears to consist entirely of
>supporting evidence for CPT symmetry, which is fairly fundamental to
>Physics, and has been for quite some time - ever since K-mesons were
>observed to violate CP symmetry by decaying so as to favour the production
>of matter over antimatter.
Well having re-read the article, and Googled on CPT violation, "I'm
not entirely sure of how far CPT
Conservation or symmetry is regarded now".
Bear in mind of course that something is wrong in physics, though
_possibly_ less than is wrong in medicine ;-)
Julian
|