Do stop, K! no, no, go on and on and on. we could orchestrate a
May-December thingie and all hoo read this will know that somehow they're a
part of it, a kinda witnesses-to-the-event deal. yes yes! they'll be a
part of it, too! I will be the better-working radiator for you! you will
be my liddle Pooh Bear K, and life for us will go fairly well until you get
married - at about the same time my grandtwins do - not to disparage the
disparitied ages, you understand. this may be the first time you've been
proposed to, so I'll be gentle, natch. later I'll decide exactly what it is
I've proposed. but oh dear we can wait, certainly.
I think this definitely counts as nearly 4 posts for this day, no?
yours forever in the alphabet,
J
----- Original Message -----
From: "kasper salonen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 1:36 AM
Subject: Re: to the attention of the List
I feel the Force of your littlemad conch-response & it finds a
response in me to the same J. listless fiery (fiersome) list posts
sometimes wanly outweigh food set on the table as opposed to
anti-hoots set on a tablet & mailed on and I KNOW it must make your
age J seem so far ahead of the one-word WH-clause mewed previously. if
it's a responder's selfbelittling consolation, J-before-K, then I'll
tell you that right now it's 3 am instead of sleeping I'm here after
considering your postage that I read earlier but isn't something I
prepared earlier, my oven goes up to a cool only 100 degrees because
the numbness metaphysical-wrinkling hasn't warmed it anymore
thanthat!! if not pathetic thenthat's at least adolescent NOT to say
averse to outpostings -- it's just hiccoughs or hiccups lasting longer
thanthat of the readingring's burbling tone which do something to
scoff or ""scough"".
my bed is just the right temperature now in sheet terms, you know?,
just cool enough to slip in & better thanthat sofa I sit at, in what
must be blue light (from the monitor) but here! I am, iambing a bit
too much as a w/sh itty reponse -- no lamb here, and my faked patois
not petit pois at ALL that's what I'm saying J. I'd say JJ but then
the repeated [voiced postalveolar affricate] would minus your years by
a semi-century NOTE: i use 'you' in the shakespeherian sense, opposed
to 'thou' J since THAT is the tone i'm going for rather thanthat
latter (which can be evidenced by looking, for insatnce, at Fool to
Lear or Kent at Oswald)
so, bon apetit = hyvää ruokahalua!
K-post-J
On 02/11/2007, Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> not a moment too soon and thank you K for your providing the opportunity
> to
> respond tho the idea of preparing to enjoy an evening of preparing to
> enjoy
> a lovely meal and the pleasure of others' real actual human palpable
> company
> must be delayed for the purposes of writing a longish post not even
> marginally related to the meaning of the post if that were possible in
> this
> particular case of the previous poster who seems unable to manage more
> than
> one word. work at it K so that at least you give me the chance to +not+
> respond with relativeness of meaning. for goodness sake the idea of
> forsaking day-old lamb mince and parsnips in favor of this response is
> utterly tragic. even mint and chocolate ice cream must be set aside for
> this dithered nattering poetry-related post. alas i'll simply need to
> provide the listmembers with hundreds and hundreds of recycled revisions
> of
> my awesomely spectacular dogs short for doggerel.
>
> I repeat: I think therefore iamb. and other such stuff as will fill the
> darlinglittle pockets of digest as will qualify my quotidian oh hell with
> the spelling of quotidian quota for the day.
>
> I may be weakening due to the Force of Kasper oh for goodness' sakes, can
> I
> allow a mere child to turn me off the game of plenitudinous
> outpostings????????????????!!!!!!!! no no wait my Psychic Orphan which
> resides somewhere near the lamb mince and petit pois tells me that Kasper
> is
> a person of mean age and much means which means he may be oh fooey it's
> time to time the steaming broccoli. later K.
>
> your dilatory but dignified doxy-friend J just one letter before yours
> which
> is K.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "kasper salonen" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 7:12 PM
> Subject: Re: to the attention of the List
>
>
> > what
> >
> > On 02/11/2007, Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >> oh egad the troublesomeness of it all what with my being a stubborn one
> >> and
> >> all, now not only will I hafta up my quota to 2-4 posts a day, but I'll
> >> hafta exceed that in order to feel free and truly poetically
> >> individualistic - say 12 to 14 posts a day. And these should be
> >> longish
> >> posts, chock fulla stuff that only my Inner Poet would want to read and
> >> that
> >> no one would understand anyway. Niverth'less, I will try oh I will try
> >> to
> >> cooperate in that spirit we all know as refusing to knuckle under to
> >> authority no matter how gentle the authority comes on. I am woman hear
> >> me
> >> roar!
> >>
> >> and certainly +this+ post will not count toward my quota.
> >>
> >> Judy Pooh Bear of the last lot of obnoxious posters who mourns her lack
> >> of
> >> sympathetic company and now hard at work making inconsequential, silly
> >> posts
> >> that bear no logical relationship to other posters' posts. I'll simply
> >> hafta put my sheaf of pregnantly reproducing and nubile poems aside . .
> >> .
> >> .
> >> oh pore tragic creature that I am!
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Anny Ballardini" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 7:39 AM
> >> Subject: to the attention of the List
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Could people limit their posts to a maximum of two to four per day?
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
|