JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  November 2007

GP-UK November 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Do I have to refer privately?

From:

Russell Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

GP-UK <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:49:48 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (147 lines)

Emile de Sousa said:

"I think you're right, but I sympathise with those who say that they
sometimes take the easier option. Mind you, we charge £50 to validate
the referral, and that tends to lead to a few slammed doors too."

Tom Sargant said:

"Can you charge for private referrals? Or is this "validation" some
way round that?

If so details please ;¬)"

Charging for validating the referral (ie signing a form for the
patient to enable them to claim money or services with a value) is not
only acceptable but is sound business practice, as it goes toward
guaranteeing the income of the practice.

Charging for the referral on the other hand is specifically prohibited
in the GP contract.  I can quote the relevant sections of the regs if
you wish, but it makes me appear to be somewhat single-minded.  (My
knowledge is purely for personal gain of course - how else can one
argue from a position of strength with the PCT when they wish to try
something out which might be said by me to be outwith the contract?)

Russell

On 29/11/2007, North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent CM3 6AH
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Many years ago, patients used to bring in forms for us to sign, for which we
> charged. I've not seen one of these for years. I heard at the time that they
> were getting the consultant to sign them instead, which seemed to make a
> mockery of any sort of gatekeeping role.
>
>
>
> It seems very odd that BUPA etc don't ask us to confirm in some way that we
> think it appropriate that they should shell out for the referral. It would
> seem very much in their interest to do so.
>
>
>
> Is there any BMA guidance on charging for referring, 'validating' or
> 'screening' in these situations?
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>  From: Paul Miller [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>  Sent: 28 November 2007 19:35
>  To: [log in to unmask]
>  Subject: Re: Do I have to refer privately?
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>  How much are BUPA paying you to do their screening for them?  Can I get
> some?
>
>
>
>
>
> On 28/11/2007, Paul Bromley < [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I think you are probably both correct. However, faced with this
>  situation I would opt for the easy life. I personally think that BUPA
>  encourages this by telling the patients to get the form signed.
>  Increasingly these days with NHS patients if they are demanding
>  referral I refer - however I do state in the referral that the patinet
>  is demanding referral. Perhaps not in this case, but there is a no-win
>  situation if the patient subsequently had pathology and did not refer.
>  I am NOT a high referrer.
>
>  Paul Bromley
>
>  On 28/11/2007, Geoff Schrecker < [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  > I think you are a trained clinician, and if you don't think he will
>  > benefit from physio, but say yes so that he can claim from BUPA you
>  > are colluding in fraud. You have done right.
>  >
>  > Cheers Geoff
>  >
>  > On Nov 28, 2007 5:41 PM, North Mike (F81717) Maylandsea Medical Cent
>  > CM3 6AH < [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Just had a patient slam out because I have said that I do not think his
>  > > ankle requires physio. (Turned it over yesterday, minimal bruising and
>  > > swelling, walking normally, needing no analgesia). He insists that as
> he
>  > > belongs to a scheme that he is entitled to use it on each and every
> occasion
>  > > that he wishes (several previous referrals). I feel I have a duty to
> refer
>  > > only if I think it appropriate, not on demand, and that is why BUPA
> have
>  > > told him to ask me for a referral. I have said that I am happy to
> discuss it
>  > > with BUPA if they care to phone me. He is quite sure that if he asked
> the
>  > > physio if it needed physio he would say yes. I agree that he would!,
> and
>  > > BUPA know that, and that's why they ask him to see me first rather than
>  > > self-refer.
>  > >
>  > > What do you think?
>  > >
>  > > Mike
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments unless by prior
>  > arrangement.
>  > See
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
>  >
>
>
>  --
>  Best Wishes
>
>  Paul Bromley
>
>  www.informatiks.com
>  Custom EMIS LV Software.
>  vuE | GPLabels | GPDocs | eGFRChecker
>
>
>
>
>  --
>  Dr Paul Miller
>  Tel: 07711-346-928
>  http://visionblogged.blogspot.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager