The GP Systems of Choice programme is supposed to give you the freedom
to chose the system which you think is best for the job. If you don't
want to migrate, then don't!!
bw
Bill Westwood
On 26 Nov 2007, at 17:03, Mary Hawking wrote:
> Are you migrating under LSP or the GPSoC contract? If under the LSP
> contract, how does it compare to the GPSoC one?
> I appreciate that in both cases the contract is actually between the
> supplier and the PCT - but it would be interesting to have some idea
> of the T&C of an LSP procurement!
>
> I assume that you had a good reason for changing systems in the
> first place!
>
> Are you contemplating having a shared GP/Community system?
> If you are, what are the arrangements regarding clinical governance,
> access permission (can anyone in the Community authorise others to
> access the practice database, in whole or in part? Can the system be
> fixed so that a DN can see her workload, or does access to one
> patient's records in the GP system allow access to all of them?
>
> Who is the data controller in either a combined record or under an
> LSP contract?
>
> Please share your experiences with the list..
>
> Bw
>
> MaryH
>
> In message <[log in to unmask]
> >, TIM WALTER <[log in to unmask]> writes
>> So why switch from whatever you currently have. If it were the other
>> way round I might understand it but isn't it supposed to be a
>> **clinical** system? Confusing = dangerous in my veiw...
>>
>> From: Paul Caldwell [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 26 November 2007 16:02
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: System 1
>>
>> we r undergoing training for S1 and going live in 2 weeks. What r
>> your clinical experience of it? Initial impressions seem that it is
>> excellent for admin but the screen is too busy, confusing and
>> cliniicians have problems navigating quickly around it during a
>> consultation.
>> The next generation of MSN Hotmail has arrived - Windows Live
>> Hotmail
>
> --
> Mary Hawking
>
|