it's funny you repeat a word that doesn't seem to exist.
but if you mean iteratability, then I agree. Pound's MakeItNew holds
water, by my reckoning; 'It' being everything sayable/said in the
world.
KS
On 30/10/2007, Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Iterability.
>
> I'll say it again: iterability.
>
> Poetry is already repetition (not of the same, but of a kind that
> disturbs identity), and already subtracted from the immediate context
> within which it appears, not least because it is capable of surviving -
> as inscription - that context and everything/body within it.
>
> This isn't transcendence, however, but the contexture of immanence itself.
>
> Dominic
>
|