JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM Archives

HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM  October 2007

HERFORUM October 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Scandinavian Fortifications in the UK

From:

Mike Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Issues related to Historic Environment Records <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:53:31 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (154 lines)

This sounds rather like the common antiquarian tradition of trying to fit a documentary reference to the closest large earthwork.  There are of course hundreds of spurious references to Danes Camps etc such as at Hunsbury hill fort/Danes Camp near Northampton.  Interesting though if there aren't any definite sites.  Attempting to distinguish between Saxon and Danish burh defences is of course fraught with difficulty given the short time span.  Just goes to show how difficult it is to actually prove anything.
 
 
Mike Shaw
 
 
 
 
________________________________

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records on behalf of CARLISLE, Philip
Sent: Thu 18/10/2007 11:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Scandinavian Fortifications in the UK



Hi all,

Frank Stenton mentions Danish fortifications in Tempsford in Bedford (not too far from Stamford) and the scheduled monument description for Gannocks Castle states that the site is believed to be that of the fortress mentioned in the AS Chronicles see below.

"The monument includes the remains of the Medieval moated enclosure of Gannocks Castle
The moated site is rectangular in form measuring some 65m
by 55m including the 10m wide surrounding moat. The moat is some 2.5m deep
and water-filled along its northern arm. Entrance to the interior is
provided by a slight causeway at the north-east corner. A substantial inner
bank or rampart is visible around the edge of the island on all but the east
side. A small mound measuring 7m across is located at the north-east corner
of the island and may be the location of a defensive building or structure
opposite the entrance. A low bank is evident along the outer eastern edge of
the moat although its central section is only barely visible.
The site is believed to be built on the same spot as an earlier Danish
Fortress referred to in the Anglo-Saxon chronicle as being constructed in
921 AD and captured later that year by Edward the Elder."


Phil

Phil Carlisle
Data Standards Supervisor
English Heritage
National Monuments Record Centre
Kemble Drive
Swindon
SN2 2GZ
+44 (0)1793 414824

http://thesaurus.english-heritage.org.uk/


The information contained within this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. If you have received the e-mail in error, please inform the sender and delete it from your system. The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed to anyone else or copied without the sender's consent.

Any views and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of English Heritage. English Heritage will not take any responsibility for the views of the author.

P Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to


-----Original Message-----
From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Wardle
Sent: 18 October 2007 10:24
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Scandinavian Fortifications in the UK

A very open question for which I sure there is no certain answer: You might look to see if there's any evidence that the burh defences at York and the five boroughs might not have been Saxon. There's no such evidence at Leicester. More generally you might try the Heritage Gateway, but don't get your hopes too high!

As for Repton it's still not published, but I believe Biddle changed his view about a "'D'-shaped Danish enclosure" and concluded that the large ditch and boat dock were the remains of a Norman castle next to the Trent, and which was flattened after the Stephen/Matilda civil war. 

Chris Wardle
City Archaeologist
Planning Policy & Design
Leicester City Council
Block A
New Walk Centre
Welford Place
Leicester. LE1 6ZR
0116 2527282
[log in to unmask]

>>> David Evans <[log in to unmask]> 18/10/2007 08:49:36 >>>
This is going to sound like one of those annoying student requests - so
here goes.

I know of a number of documentary references to Scandinavian (I expect
we are not allowed to call them Viking anymore) fortifications in
C10-11UK, however apart from the dubious case of Repton, does anyone
know of any certain examples, another Aggersborg would be nice!



David Evans

Historic Environment Record Officer

Planning and Environment

South Gloucestershire Council

Civic Centre

High Street

Kingswood

BS15 9TR

Phone: 01454 863649

fax:       01454 865173




**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from South
Gloucestershire Council are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the South Gloucestershire Council
Postmaster at the address below.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has
been swept for the presence of computer viruses.

[log in to unmask]
**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the
views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it
from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in
any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: This email and files transmitted are
confidential and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient.  If you are not the intended
recipient, or the person responsible for delivering it to 
the intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, 
distribute or use it in any unauthorised manner.  If you 
have received this email in error please notify us by 
email to [log in to unmask] and then delete 
it and any attachments accompanying it.  Please note that
Wolverhampton City Council cannot guarantee that this 
message or any attachments are virus free or have not been
intercepted and amended.
Any views or opinions expressed within this email are
those of the author and may not necessarily reflect those 
of Wolverhampton City Council and no contractual 
arrangement is intended to arise from this communication.
==============================================================================

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager