Neil,
I had noticed something similar when running bedpostx in a non-native Linux
environment. What OS are you using to run FSL?
Peace,
Matt.
-----Original Message-----
From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Neil Killeen
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 7:53 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [FSL] bedpost vs bedpostx performance
Hi
I have noticed that the running times for V 3.3.6/bedpost and V4.0/bedpostx
are hugely different. On my relatively small test data set, each
3.3.6/bedpost slice
runs in a few minutes (diff_pvm). However, 4.0/bedpostx takes a
VERY long time (> 60 min). It is the xfibres process that takes the time.
I am assuming this is not right and I have something to track down, or
could it possibly bve something to do with different algorithms and
the particular data set ?
thanks
Neil
|