Sorry for getting back to this so late, but DC-2007 got in between...
sön 2007-08-19 klockan 14:27 -0400 skrev Bruce D'Arcus:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a bibliographic ontology with some folks, and wanting to
> make as much use of DC as reasonable. I'm trying to tie up some issues
> related to mediatype/formmat, best illustrated with the example of
> memos republished on microfilm. Would the following be the correct use
> of dcterms:medium, and if yes, are there good canonical URIs for this
> sort of stuff (so we don't have to create them)?
>
> <http://ex.net/1> a bibo:Letter ;
> bibo:contribution [ bibo:role bibo_roles:author ; bibo:contributor
> <http://ex.net/x> ] ;
> bibo:contribution [ bibo:role bibo_roles:recipient ;
> bibo:contributor <http://ex.net/y> ] ;
> dcterms:date "1973-03-14" ;
> dcterms:medium bibo_media:microfilm ;
Looks ok. Note that according to
http://dublincore.org/documents/2007/07/02/domain-range/
you'd have (due to range of dcterms:medium)
bibo_media:microfilm rdf:type dcterms:PhysicalMedium
which I suppose is OK.
I'm unaware of a suitable vocabulary at this point, though in a year or
so we might see something coming out of the DC-RDA work (with a bit of
luck).
http://dublincore.org/dcmirdataskgroup/
/Mikael
> dcterms:isPartOf <http://ex.net/2> .
>
> <http://ex.net/2> a bibo:Collection ;
> dcterms:title "Some Microfilm Collection" ;
> dcterms:publisher <http://ex.net/3> .
>
> Bruce
>
--
<[log in to unmask]>
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
|