On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:36:13 +0000, Wim Vranken <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hi Gary,
>
>Try turning off 'compress resonances' when exporting, see if that
>works.
I am doing that now and the result is... it doesn't help
366 {87.HN 64.HN} 8.228 0.050 0.050 ? 0.000 {?} {87.N 64.N}
121.313 0.050 0.050 ? 0.000 {?} {86.HA 87.HA 62.HA} 4.521
0.050 0.050 ? 0.000 {?} 18409741.81250 1533865.25000 1 {?} 0
> Technically, though, as far as I'm aware, the NMRView peak
>list assignments are of an 'all possibilities between these atoms
>possible' philosophy, so the output is correct in that sense. If that
>has changed, let me know!
Now i always understood differently but may be wrong ;-)
so I always though that to define possibilities you used sub lists eg the
length of the entries on each dimension should match
e.g.
dim1 {A C}
dim2 {B D}
defines two assignments
A-B and C-D
whereas
dim1 {A C}
dim2 {B {D E}}
defines 3 possibilities
A-B C-D and C-E
but my memory may be deluded ;-) I guess the only way to know would be to
e-mail bruce
actually have just been an tested it a bit so I created a new list on a hsqc
and assigned the first peak to several different peaks using the left right
arrows (see attached piccies) and got the following entry in the peak file:
0 {1.HN 3.HN 4.HN} 9.99691 0.03525 0.05017 ++ 0.00000 {?} {1.HA {3.HA 4.HA}
4.HA} 130.42625 0.31298 0.43736 ++ 0.00000 {?} 1.88465 1.88465 0 {?} 0
now this isn't abolute proof that i am correct it maybe just an artifact but
its how I have always used it...
regards
gary
>
>Bye,
>
>Wim
>=========================================================================
|