> First of all, if we scroll through our source peaks and find a case where
> there are two or more targets, the targets are sorted by Peak # and
> Distance. I'm not sure that peak number is the best way to sort this.
But the peaks are initially sorted by shift distance. Or at least they are
when I test and when I look trough the code. Besides, you can sort on
whatever table column you like...
> To figure out the peak number of the potential target we have to click
> on the peak and type 's' - to get the peak list table. Is it possible
> to display the peak number on the target spectrum?
What about the peak number in the table?
> If there are two targets that have a similar distance and we follow
> peaks it would be nice to be able to see which target peak is which for
> making the assignment.
If you select a target it puts a marker through it to indicate which one
will be assigned... Or it goes for the closest if you "Assign All To
Closest".
> Second of all, there might be a notifier missing or something because we
> had to adjust the Dist Threshold and it seems like we have to click one
> of the buttons on and off to "wake up" the tables, etc.
Because the <Return> key is not necessarily pressed when the value is
changed, and there is no GUI event to easily get hold of otherwise (I
wouldn't want to refresh after every key press) it is a little tricky to
fix this, and probably why I omitted it initially. I can readily add a
"Refresh" button however.
> Also, it might be considering changing reversing the way in which we do the
> copy peak assignments. In our case we have many "source peaks" and few
> "target peaks". So we have to scroll through hundreds of source peaks to
> find the half-dozen target peaks and their assignments. For us at least it
> would be more convenient if we could sort through target peaks and see the
> possible assignments to source peaks.
Having the "Only Good Matches" option set to ON should solve this by
only showing source peaks peaks for which there is a target within
distance. Or is this no good?
T.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask]
Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask]
University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766018 (office)
80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home)
Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
United Kingdom http://www.pantonia.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2- -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|