Frank von Delft wrote:
> A while ago you said you hadn't yet implemented the Richardson
> rotamers as default in coot; is this still the case?
Yes.
>
> I'm asking because I'm finding all these Arg and Lys which don't
> really look funny but are still flagged as non-rotamers -- and I
> remember the revelation when I first loaded the Richardson rotamers
> into O and suddenly all my Args were in fact legit.
OK, OK!
Soon (tm).
Paul.
|