Again this sounds like a prime documentation/guidelines-for-use issue ..
Jeremy
Brian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Patrick van der Wel wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it would be possible to make a checksum of the spectrum file
>> upon reading in the spectrum, which can be stored by the program.
>> This would allow the Analysis to detect changes in the file and then
>> give feedback to the user.
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
>
>> Perhaps the program could load the new data in as a 'new' experiment
>> (or maybe rather 'spectrum' in CCPNMR-speak?)
>
> A reprocessed version of an experiment would count as a new 'spectrum'
> in the strict sense of the data model. It's currently often very
> convenient to slip a reprocessed version of a spectrum into the same
> place in an analysis project without the hassle of copying peak
> objects etc., etc. (remembering of course that peak intensities etc.
> may need to be recalculated as appropriate).
>
--
*********************************************************************************
Dr C. Jeremy Craven
Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology
University of Sheffield,
Firth Court, Western Bank
S10 2TN Sheffield UK
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
http://www.nmr.group.shef.ac.uk/CJC.html
Phone: x24323
From outside Sheffield: 0114 222 4323
From outside UK: +44 114 2224323
Fax: 0114 272 2800
*********************************************************************************
|