JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  September 2007

CCP4BB September 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: the worst molecular replacment probes

From:

Poul Nissen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:29:16 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (61 lines)

An old example:
The Phe-tRNA:EF-Tu:GDPNP ternary complex - three complexes per asymmetric
unit, C2 space group, degenerate three-fold NCS (three different tRNA
conformations in the trimer). 40 - 2.8 Å resolution native data (about 78%
complete...) used for MR. Straight-forward placement of three EF-Tu copies
using 10 - 3.5 Å resolution data (AMORE).
A single copy of a truncated tRNA model (representing about 7% of the
macromolecular mass of the asymmetric unit) was placed using data in the
15 - 6 Å range (AMORE) and identified by significantly better statistics
of the corresponding TF solution (with EF-Tu molecules placed as prior
models) compared to all other RF solutions - ~48% R-factor compared to
~52%+ for other solutions as I recall, and similar distinction of PC
value. Optimisation of the RF peak value for this single solution (by
variations of RF search parameters) produced a second solution in the RF
top-100 peak list that also yielded a distinct solution in TF. Third tRNA
molecule was placed by screening of the degenerate three-fold rotation by
"manual" MR. Only low resolution data worked for the tRNA MR.
Gradual model refinement (TNT) completed the structure (PDB 1TTT) and
bogus occupancy refinement of tRNA complemented B-factor refinement as
judged by a significantly improved Rfree value. Post-refinement using CNS
with proper ML target and anisotropic scaling makes the bogus occupancy
refinement obsolete - today TLS parameterisation would probably do an even
better job).
I didn't check but the tRNA RMSD (truncated model vs. refined structure)
will probably exceed 1 Å.

All pretty well decribed in:
Nissen P, Kjeldgaard M, Thirup S, Polekhina G, Reshetnikova L, Clark BF,
Nyborg J (1995). "Crystal structure of the ternary complex of Phe-tRNAPhe,
EF-Tu, and a GTP analog.” Science, 270, 1464-72.


Poul


> would anyone be willing to share stories of the worst molecular
> replacement search probes they used to get the correct solution purely
> with MR?
>
> perhaps in terms of %-scattering, RMSD, Z-score, LLG, or other possibly
> specific scoring values.
>
> -bryan
>
>


--
========================================================
Poul Nissen, professor, ph.d.
Centre for Membrane Pumps in Cells and Disease - PUMPKIN
University of Aarhus, Dept. Molecular Biology
Gustav Wieds Vej 10C, DK - 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

http://www.mb.au.dk
http://www.bioxray.dk
http://www.pumpkin.au.dk
[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]

Tel. +45 8942 5025, Fax +45 8612 3178, [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager