Tim,
> It all works at the moment and I can continue doing it this way. Maybe the
> complicated ones do need a separate system.
Some were tricky. I'm happy to continue in the same vein.
> >> If there is a good reason for it I can stick with it, else I'll have a
> >> look at simplifying things.
> >
> > Please don't be too long. I don't want to be here to 5:30 this week.
> >
>
> Sorry. I wasn't doing it today. It's Admissions Day here so I'm on
> holiday.
I don't want to embark on lots of coding only to find it superseded upon
my return. I just wanted to know if you were going ahead with a docs
package. Leave that for later. The main job is to make the manuals
accessible from the regular Starlink site.
> To be fair, I did send a followup correcting this.
I was only ribbing you because SUG and SG is only one document! You
honestly didn't know. (-: So are you going to do the SGPs or are you
leaving the lot to me? I just don't want us duplicating while I'm
offline.
> Yes. I'm assuming a new target, like the postscript one. dvipdfm seems to
> be more robust than dvipdf.
You can sort that out.
> Yes. And are you complaining that we have started discussing it again? :-)
Complaining? No. You're confusing this with SUN/233. (-: I decided
to do this job long before the recent e-mails from users unable to
locate documents.
Happy Admissions,
Malcolm
|