Julian Bradley wrote:
>
> If this description, together with the possibility of detecting the rare
> condition of haemochromatosis doesn't seem to justify the test we should
> probably stop doing it, and I agree that opening such issues up to
> professional and public debate and scrutiny is helpful.
>
How rare is haemochromatosis? I recall reading that it isn't very rare -
like about 1 in 2 to 3 hundred.
Average list will have 5 or 6 I guess - seems high to me though.
Cheers
--
Jel
|