Microscopic haematuria aged over 50 is a 2/52 rule referral round here -
dealt with by urology. However, nothing in the 2/52 rule guidelines about
what to do with previously investigated persistent haematuria. But if he's
not been scoped, I think he probably warrants this to rule out TCC as
already mentioned
Margaret
> At age over 50 the chance of a urological rather than a nephrological
> diagnosis is said to be increased, but microscopic haematuria is
> nephrology, is it not, rather than urology?
>
> --
> A
>
>
|