Can you upload the data onto
www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/upload.cgi
and send me the reference number please?
Thanks
T
On 22 Aug 2007, at 17:24, Roderick McColl wrote:
> Two other issues related to the new FSLVIEW, at least as it impacts
> my data.
>
> In comparison to the FSLVIEW in FSL 3.3, when I look at DTI data
> using the FSLVIEW in FSL 4.0
> using V1 and FA, the axial and coronal images are displaced to the
> left of the display box (to the right of the head) by about 40 per
> cent of the FOV,
> and the lines don't "look right". Does this reflect some change in
> the detection of orientation between the two versions?
>
> -roddy
>
>>>> Matt Glasser <[log in to unmask]> 8/21/2007 9:50 AM >>>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The new version of FSLView has the annoying habit of taking the
> cal_max from
> the NIFTI header of the FA and using it when displaying the FA
> modulated
> color map no matter what the Max is set to inside FSLView. This
> means that
> if a high cal_max value is set somewhere in the preprocessing
> chain, you
> can't display an FA modulated color map in FSLView without manually
> editing
> the header to change cal_max to 1. It would be better if FSLView
> used the
> value in the Max box or assumed all FAs had a max of one.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Matt.
|