Keith,
Yes but language wise its still not very logical.
and yes one can use human right for pwith imp. but I would never clssify myself as such. I am a person with a variation in body structure/funcion not as having on impairment.
Cheers
Gregor
keith armstrong wrote:
> gregor
>
> the word 'disability' has always referred to the denial of a legal right.
>
> how about 'human rights for people with impairments' our people are political prisoners imprisoned in 'homes' throughout the western world because of political policies while the states are investing in the death culture.
>
> keith
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:10:20 -0600 , Gregor Wolbring <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> yes but if we are not consistent how can we blame others?
>> Like we use disability rights however disability describes a violation of a right so to use the term disability right seem to be wrong usage of the term. What is intended is right of a disabled person or right of a person disabled by
>>
>> cheers
>> gregor
>>
>
>
________________End of message______________________
This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about the list administratione should be sent to [log in to unmask]
Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|