The closest thing to a review of this I have been able to find is the
brief report in the Intute (formerly Humbul) entry for the Chicago Homer
at
<http://www.intute.ac.uk/artsandhumanities/cgi-bin/fullrecord.pl?handle=humbul8520>.
A fuller review would be most welcome, both at CSC, *and*, I would have
thought, this sort of publication ought to be reviewed at BMCR as well.
Has anyone ever managed to get an online publication reviewed for it's
content by Bryn Mawr?
G
OKELL E.R. a écrit :
> Following on from the exchange in June copied below...
>
> Is there anyone who is using this in their teaching who would like to review it for the History, Classics and Archaeology Higher Education Academy Subject Centre?
>
> Classics in the Subject Centre would like very much to create a web-based body of reviews of this sort of resource, which would comment on their accuracy, usability etc. and upon ways in which they can be integrated into teaching.
>
> If you would like to review this resource (or any other similar resource of your suggestion) please contact Eleanor OKell (the Classics Project Officer: [log in to unmask]) to discuss details (including a length and date to suit you!)
>
> Many thanks,
> Eleanor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Digital Classicist List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Martin Mueller
> Sent: 28 June 2007 16:25
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [DIGITALCLASSICIST] Chicago Homer review
>
> It's never been reviewed as far as I know. It's pretty widely used, and over the years a number of people have pointed out various errors.
>
> It is
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>
>> That's a good question. I believe at least one (if not both) of the
>> senior editors of the Chicago Homer are on this list. Has the
>> publication been submitted to BMCR, e.g.? Are there other specifically
>> classical venues that would review this sort of thing? What about
>> digital venues?
>>
>> As for your final question, I think we should wait until the first has
>> been answered before speculating. ;-)
>>
>> G
>>
>> Neven Jovanović a écrit :
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> is there a scholarly review of the Chicago Homer
>>> (http://www.library.northwestern.edu/homer/)?
>>>
>>> A search on the internet and several scholarly journals databases
>>> turns out just one mention (in a book notice: Concordantia Homerica.
>>> Pars 2.
>>> Ilias, a Computer Concordance to the van Thiel Edition of Homer's
>>> Iliad, J. R. Tebben, by A. Kahane, The Journal of Hellenic Studies,
>>> Vol.
>>> 121.
>>> (2001), pp. 182-183.).
>>>
>>> I would greatly appreciate any information --- also on the possible
>>> reasons of Chicago Homer *not* getting a review.
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>>
>>>
>>> Neven Jovanovic
>>>
>>> Zagreb, Hrvatska / Croatia
>> --
>> Dr Gabriel BODARD
>> (Epigrapher & Digital Classicist)
>>
>> Centre for Computing in the Humanities King's College London Kay House
>> 7, Arundel Street London WC2R 3DX
>>
>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>> Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
>> Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
>>
>> http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
>> http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
--
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Epigrapher & Digital Classicist)
Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
Kay House
7, Arundel Street
London WC2R 3DX
Email: [log in to unmask]
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
|