JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DC-EDUCATION Archives


DC-EDUCATION Archives

DC-EDUCATION Archives


DC-EDUCATION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DC-EDUCATION Home

DC-EDUCATION Home

DC-EDUCATION  August 2007

DC-EDUCATION August 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: DC-Education Application Profile: update + feedback requested

From:

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Mikael Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:54:49 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (164 lines)

Dodging all the other issues in this thread, I'd just like to add that
during the coming months, the Joint DCMI/IEEE Taskforce will output a
set of properties derived from LOM but expressed in terms of the DCAM.

These will hopefully cover many of the cases where you want to reuse LOM
elements.

Also, the work will include declarations of LOM vocabularies, including
URIs, that will make them reusable in the DC-Ed AP.

The plan is to get them approved by the IEEE LTSC, so they will get
formal status eventually.

The current version at 

http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/DCMIIEEELTSCTaskforce

is not current WRT the new version of the DCAM, so is not currently
reliable.

Regarding the "AP module" notion:

1. I agree that this is good description of what you are trying to do.
2. It's still true that we are not 100% sure how that will interact with
the current work on DCMI Description Set Profiles. But the DC-Ed AP is a
good test case.
3. I still think a domain model is useful. It will only be partial, but
still I see value in deciding on where in the FRBR hierarchy the
properties fit, for example, and to model things like agents, etc. as
Phil mentioned.

/Mikael


sön 2007-08-12 klockan 20:19 +0100 skrev Sarah Currier:
> Dear all,
> 
> The Dublin Core Conference 2007 in Singapore is fast approaching.  The
> next face-to-face meeting of the DC-Ed Community will take place
> there.
> 
> Diane Hillmann, Stuart Sutton and I have been working hard to get
> draft materials related to the proposed DC-Ed Application Profile
> ready for this meeting.  We would like to disseminate the results of
> this work prior to the meeting so that anyone who can't attend can
> give feedback and input.  We'd be very grateful if you could spend
> some time having a look and feeding back to us.  Discussion on this
> list is particularly welcome.  If you only have time to look at the
> areas that particularly interest you, that's fine!  I have tried to
> delineate the different areas we'd like feedback on below, to make it
> easier for you.
> 
> We now have a wiki page linking to a new draft Application Profile
> document:
> http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/Working_20Draft_20of_20DC_2dEd_20Application_20Profile
> 
> This draft gives an overview of the background and purpose of, and
> requirements for, the AP.  It lists the metadata elements for
> inclusion in the AP, along with IEEE LOM correlations, and notes
> aiming to make a start on guidance for use of the elements involved. 
> 
> It also includes a list of additional IEEE LOM elements related to
> educational use of resources, and outlines a workplan and community
> acceptance plan for taking the AP forward. 
> 
> Any feedback gratefully received.  Here are some particular areas you
> may like to look at:
> 
> 1. Expression of the AP using the DCAM Description Set Profile. A
> draft of this document is available at:
> http://dublincore.org/architecturewiki/DescriptionSetProfile.
> Volunteers to help with this would be very welcome.
> 
> 
> 2. Best practice guidance notes for the properties covered within the
> AP.  NB: There are comments for many of the properties in v0.3 of the
> AP, which are noted in the new working draft- do these meet your
> needs / seem reasonable / useful?  Any further suggestions?
> 
> 3. Conforming to educational achievement standards. Stuart Sutton has
> done some valuable work on the use of conformsTo as a refinement of
> the Relation property.  NB LOM users: conformsTo is not in the core
> DCMI vocabulary used in the LOM Relation fields- it is a more recent
> refinement of this element.  The intention of conformsTo in the DC-Ed
> AP is to support relating of educational resources to curricula,
> competency frameworks, learning objectives and the like.  See Stuart's
> notes at http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/Correlation_20Resource
> for ideas about how to express the closeness of fit of a resource to a
> particular educational achievement standard.
> 
> 4. Use of further IEEE LOM elements in the DC-Ed AP.  The working
> draft has a table listing relevant LOM elements and giving information
> about them.  Do any of these look like properties you would wish to
> describe for educational resources?  Have we missed anything
> important?
> 
> 5. Vocabularies for Type and Instructional Method.  After taking on
> board discussion and feedback on the DC-Ed Community email list, and
> at the DC-themed meeting of the JISC-CETIS Metadata SIG earlier this
> year, we now have an updated wiki page summarising the approach of
> DC-Ed to recommending vocabularies for the AP, including a page on the
> four draft criteria for recommending
> vocabularies:http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/Vocabularies
> 
> We also have a document listing all of the vocabularies we have so far
> identified, along with notes on how they meet the four draft criteria
> discussed earlier.  This is available here:
> http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dhbqfq9m_0f6mdc2  (NB: It is also linked
> to from the DC-Ed wiki vocabularies page).
> 
> If you have a vocabulary that isn't listed, or if you have further
> information on any of the vocabularies listed, please let me know.
> 
> Equally, if you have any further ideas on recommending vocabularies in
> the AP, please let us know.
> 
> 6. Workplan and Community Acceptance Plan.  These are noted near the
> end of the AP document, and are admittedly a bit sketchy.  If anyone
> is of a particularly administrative frame of mind and has
> feedback/suggestions, we will be interested to hear them.
> 
> Many thanks all.  Please disseminate this email to individuals or fora
> you know of that may be interested, and do encourage people to join
> the DC-Education list as well.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Sarah
> 
> -- 
> Sarah Currier
> Co-Moderator, Dublin Core Education Community
> 
> Product Manager, Intrallect Ltd.
> http://www.intrallect.com
> 
> 2nd Floor, Regent House
> Blackness Road
> Linlithgow
> EH49 7HU
> United Kingdom
> 
> Tel: +44 870 234 3933    Mob: +44 (0)7980855801
> E-mail: [log in to unmask] 
> --
> 
> -- 
> Sarah Currier
> Product Manager, Intrallect Ltd.
> http://www.intrallect.com
> 
> 2nd Floor, Regent House
> Blackness Road
> Linlithgow
> EH49 7HU
> United Kingdom
> 
> Tel: +44 870 234 3933    Mob: +44 (0)7980855801
> E-mail: [log in to unmask] 
> --
-- 
<[log in to unmask]>

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

August 2021
May 2021
April 2021
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
April 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
August 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
November 2011
October 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
July 2006
January 2006
December 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
December 2004
November 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
June 2003
April 2003
January 2003
November 2002
October 2002
June 2002
February 2002
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
June 2001
March 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager