Yes, agreed. Will amend accordingly.
Those attributes are supposed to be called dcxm:valueRef and dcxm:resourceId, not dcxm:descriptionRef and dcxm:descriptionId. The text says that but example 20 was wrong. I'll update it.
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: DCMI Architecture Forum on behalf of Mikael Nilsson
Sent: Thu 8/23/2007 3:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Revised version of DC-XML-Min (2007-06-19)
One issue here:
"In the non-literal value surrogates in the fourth statement in the
description in the example above, however, no valueURI or vocabulary
encoding scheme URI are present. In this case, an XML attribute with the
name dcxm:valueType with the value 'NonLiteral' is required to indicate
that the Statement Element represents a statement containing a
non-literal value surrogate. Where a non-literal surrogate has a value
string but novalueURI or vocabulary encoding scheme URI, this XML
attribute is required. "
The valueType should also not be necessary when there is a
dcxm:descriptionRef attribute, I think?
/Mikael
|