On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:13:29PM +0100, Phil Evans wrote:
> What do you count as raw data? Rawest are the images - everything
> beyond that is modellling - but archiving images is _expensive_!
Maybe we should contact Google to let them do it for us ;-)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6425975.stm
I doubt every crystallographer would want access to all raw datasets -
but for developers it would be ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC (similar to things
like the JCSG archive). And just imagine all those well collected
datasets of > 10 years ago and what we could learn from those (and the
better structures we could determine) with the modern tools and
programs ...
Clemens
--
***************************************************************
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
*
* Global Phasing Ltd.
* Sheraton House, Castle Park
* Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK
*--------------------------------------------------------------
* BUSTER Development Group (http://www.globalphasing.com)
***************************************************************
|