this is definitely like reading Joyce. I feel like I'm looking at a
masterpiece when I read this. it's beautiful!!
KS
On 31/07/07, joe green <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The Facts in the Case of Tim S.
>
> Describe the crowd at the bar "Jack London's."
>
> Fool-begged, foolish-compounded, folly-fallen footlings. foison plenty
> of flickering Flibbertigibbets, fluxive flouting-stock flewed as
> flax-wenches, fleering and flap-mouthed flirt gills and flesh mongers
> full-gorged yet frustrate. Also: pajocks and pantaloons.
> Also many insects of type Manomorium pharaonis.
>
> They weren't that bad were they?
>
> True. Those were pearls that were their eyes. Also stars may be
> made from them. The propolis of the lattice if one must admit it.
> Bee glue to Betelgeuse if they are lucky. Otherwise orphic orts
> when one is bored and nothing else is on. Marrowbones.
> Quodlibets boring. Desist at once.
>
> Describe the mood in the bar after the decedent screamed.
>
> The crystal fretting (CF) was fracted.
> A certain ontological void was created.
> The exterior envelope of the crystal fretting was palpated to
> effect a hiatus in the lattice-work.
>
> What effect did this have? Was it permanant?
>
> Dehiscence or fission de facto of course always implicated and
> a liminal porosity expected but anticipated invagination of light
> delayed and the Da of Sa and the non-place of Vorstellung
> temporarily inhibited by glissement all glockenspiel causing
> the CF to groin glutted by vacuum awaiting glissando. Everyone was
> tense. Sphatic.
>
> How did the decedent die?
>
> The decedent inserted the barrel of the Colt Model 70 semi-automatic
> pistol into his mouth. Since the decedent was completely orthognathous,
> this action was performed with some grace.
> The decedent than depressed the trigger of the pistol at the same time
> lowering the barrel of the pistol so that the bullet, when discharged,
> penetrated the fauces instead of his brains. Instead of dying at once
> the decedent experienced exsanguination and died only after 17 minutes
> had expired.
>
> What then occurred?
>
> The decedent uttered the digraph "uh" which was held for a demisemiquaver
> with insignificant (at this time) fermata. Enuresis followed with
> subsequent engorgement of tissue. Sphincter relaxed the bowels
> evacuated. Matters most sanguinary ensued not at this time deemed to
> be of sufficient interest to be denumerated. However spallation was
> noted immediately after decease but hypercharge minus baryon yields
> impossible quantum number so strangeness not calculated. Spinthariscopes
> must be improved. Also the exuviae of certain insects shed in
> the vehicle owned by the besanguined felodese were made sanguinolent by
> the blood gushing from decedent's wound and have been deemed of aesthetic
> interest. Also, the decedent wailed like a limpkin.
>
> What were the contents of the stomach of the decedent? (stomach contents)
>
> Saturated and unsaturated aliphatic compounds with an even number
> of carbon atoms. Palmitic, stearic, and oleic acids. A partially
> digested jalepeno. Additional analysis would reveal trace amounts
> of diquat. Analysis not performed by indigenous medical personnel.
>
> Was any "scat" (powdered cocaine) found on the person of the corpse
> when the corpse was examined by indigenous medical personnel?
>
> No. No "scat" (powdered cocaine) was found.
>
> List the decedents three wives.
>
> Nancy who was fancy. Fancy Nancy
> Jeannie whose eyes were so greenie.
> Sweet trembling Jennie who hands were so slow.
> Jennie the de trop.
>
> Were any of these wives fecundated by the decedent?
>
> Yes, one such wife was fecundated. The wife named "Jennie"
>
> What was the issue of this fecundation?
>
> A monster most horrible. With, however, a garland briefer than a girls.
> Fugnacious and a non-funambulist lacking all limbs it was fordone
> almost at birth. A folie a deux persisted between the decedent
> and the fecundated wife and indigenous medical personnel were
> not consulted before the birth due to a mutual sense that
> they were fordone. Afterwards the ex-fecund wife was faradized.
> To no good effect. Still she made little eyres of her cell and
> expressed a wish to be desexed. Faradization continued but her
> desire is not defeasible. The inexplicable motility of the edible
> continued.
>
> Describe the funeral rites of the decedent.
>
> He was exenterated by a skilled mortuary technician, dighted
> by this same technician in unhabitual habiliment and then
> deflagrated.
>
>
> Did all the instruments agree that the day of his dying was a dark, cold
> day?
>
> No. The sidereal day in which the decedent died had hardly begun.
> The previous day had been pluvious but little clouds were sporting in the
> welkin and the spinny stars shone seder on the little town. Also,
> the orreries in the orthoclase spun merrily.
>
>
> Did dolphins waft home the hapless youth blah blah blah?
>
> No.
>
>
> Did the decedent at any time have a SIAP (Single Integrated Action Plan)?
>
> No.
>
> Was the decedent born on a Wednesday and hence "full of woe?"
>
> No, the decedent was born on a Thursday and hence should be thought
> of as having "far to go."
>
> Have skilled exegetes analyzed the decedents literary remains?
>
> Yes.
> Their judgment?
>
> Immature influence of Garcia Lorca. Sterile staminody.
> No pnanerogam he. No diaphantine analysis required.
>
>
> Did the decedent have any hope that if he had not killed himself he
> might have helped 92 year old Professor Charles Hartshorne
> complete his sixteen-fold analysis of divine dual transcendence
> in terms of polar contraries and arrange each element of transcendence
> in a neat table of the combinations of each polar contrary in their
> double applications or inapplications (zero cases) so that their
> logical relationships can be surveyed almost at a glance as did Joseph
> Pickle of Colorado College?
>
> No. None.
>
> Did it mean anything?
>
> It?
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder tool.
>
|