Hi Nikos,
Most certainly you can have them in peaceful collaboration, both sharing the
same batch system and using the same set of WNs (we have such setup). Judging
by the use, though, the extra machine can be put to more use if installed as
WN instead of gCE :)
Best regards, Antun
-----
Antun Balaz
Research Assistant
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://scl.phy.bg.ac.yu/
Phone: +381 11 3713152
Fax: +381 11 3162190
Scientific Computing Laboratory
Institute of Physics, Belgrade, Serbia
-----
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Nick Vidiadakis <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:08:08 +0300
Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] glite-CE with SL4.4, could anyone help me?
> Hi,
>
> Small question: we are upgrading our equipment at GR-03-HEPNTUA and
> we are thinking to install a fresh CE. Its better for it to be an
> lcg-CE rather than glite-CE? In case we want to keep our old lcg-CE,
> could we have them both running?
>
> Nick
>
> Asli Zengin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just an additional comment on glite CE installation... Are you
> > installing a stand-alone glite CE at your site? As far as I know,
> > secondary glite CE is okay after a lcg CE running the batch system,
> > but it is not recommended to install only glite CE at the site. For
> > instance, you will have considerable problems with accounting since
> > your site will never be selected by WMS to run a job provided that
> > there are enough resources at a lcg CE matching the job requirements.
> > Moreover lcg CE is still accepted to be much more stable than glite CE.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Asli
> >
> >
------- End of Original Message -------
|