Hi - assuming that such methods produce accurate corrected p-values
(they should be close enough) then the normal rules apply, i.e. you
would normally threshold at p<0.05 corrected.
Cheers.
On 31 Jul 2007, at 10:00, Leon de Bruin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running Cluster-corrected analyses with pre-threshold masking, and
> wondered what kind of p values are appropriate in this case. I
> gathered from
> other discussions that the z-value depends on the size of the area
> you are
> interested in, but I'm not sure if I can use a very stringent p
> (o.oo1) or a
> more relax one (0.05).
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Leon de Bruin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|